Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 9,089
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Austin, involving the First Amendment academic-freedom rights of public school and university faculty members that was handed down last week by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:23 am
A month ago I reported on a Microsoft letter to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, asking Judge James Robart for permission to bring a motion to "renew and expand" an anti-suit injunction so as to bar Google's Motorola Mobility from suing Microsoft in Mannheim, Germany, for royalties on patents declared essential to the H.264 video codec standard. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:45 am
The court first dismissed PepsiCo. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:41 am
Venue is proper in a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:56 am
Case #11-0024 and State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:55 pm
Procedural History"Accenture Global Services, GmbH and Accenture,LLP (“Accenture”) appeal from the grant of summary judgment by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware holding that all claims of U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 8:18 pm
Both cases are on appeal to the Florida Third District Court of Appeal. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:21 pm
Supreme Court decisions, particularly the catastrophic Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:43 pm
Loretta Tutein, et al. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 2:21 pm
” With respect to the first error, the Court called the comparison “meaningless” and stated: “It conjures a comparison worse than apples to oranges. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am
As discussed here, in June 2012, Central District of California Judge R. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
In Keune v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:52 am
First, the district court reasoned that the erosion to Sequenom’s price and its loss of market share were not irreparable. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:14 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 12:52 pm
And, relying on Dixon v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 2:52 am
The First Amendment Coalition responds that Apple and Samsung have failed to establish that these docu- ments contain trade secrets because, for the reasons stated by the district court, the parties have not shown that they will suffer competitive harm from public disclo- sure. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:12 pm
The district court granted TA summary judgment, and the Queens appealed, arguing the district court erred in applying judicial estoppel. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 5:22 am
They argued that once the lower court decided to dismiss their federal claims, it should have declined to exercise jurisdiction over their remaining state law claims and simply sent the case to State court. [read post]
