Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 5961 - 5980 of 8,250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm by Jared Beck
 Drugs in the less restrictive schedules include cocaine, methamphetamine (“meth”), and phencyclidine (“PCP” or “angel dust”) (all Schedule II), and opium (Schedule V). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm by Jared Beck
 Drugs in the less restrictive schedules include cocaine, methamphetamine (“meth”), and phencyclidine (“PCP” or “angel dust”) (all Schedule II), and opium (Schedule V). [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm
Patent No. 8,419,307) ·         Count V for Patent Infringement (Inducement to Infringe U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 2:09 pm by Florian Mueller
Critics of the ITC have warned all along that this trade agency with quasijudicial powers is not going to reform itself and have urged lawmakers to require the ITC to apply a standard to import ban decisions that should be more (or fully) consistent with the eBay v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
This can happen where the applicant presents itself to the relevant public as the legal or economic successor of the holder of the former mark, when there is no continuity or inheritance relationship. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
This can happen where the applicant presents itself to the relevant public as the legal or economic successor of the holder of the former mark, when there is no continuity or inheritance relationship. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:17 pm
And, had the balance of the account stayed at $4000, either by means of additional purchases or if the account holder paid only enough to cover accrued interest, Dell would receive approximately $1120 per year in interest alone. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 7:50 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Commissioner assumed jurisdiction.In response to Eskridge’s allegations Bethpageargued that:Eskridge failed to properly serve Amanda Pirolo with a copy of her petition;  Pirolo’s name should be removed from the petition because she has not been employed by BOCES as a teacher of the deaf since 2012; Eskridge failed to name the current holder of the position, Paula Hastings, in the caption of her appeal and therefore she has failed to join necessary… [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:26 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta Jurecic posted the Lawfare Podcast: Goldsmith v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 3:31 pm by Nathan Sheard
Furthermore, LADOT’s failure to limit law enforcement access to raw trip data through anything less than a warrant signed by a judge is in seeming opposition to the Supreme Court’s holding in Carpenter v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:09 am by Neil Wilkof
The Board of Appeal even went on to state the evidence of lower sales might have been sufficient. [read post]