Search for: "State v. Losee"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 14,485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2016, 3:52 am
” At the Bill of Health Blog, Greg Lipper discusses Zubik v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 9:02 pm
Of course, that isn’t the standard under local, state, or federal antidiscrimination laws. [read post]
29 May 2016, 7:39 pm
Section 119(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) states that an employee is entitled to be paid redundancy pay by the employer if the employment is terminated at the employer’s initiative because the employer no longer requires the job done by the employee to be done by anyone, except where this is due to the ordinary and customary turnover of labour (the Exception). [read post]
29 May 2016, 2:08 pm
We are not built to be satisfied.We're Running The Red Queen's Race And We're Always Losing "Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place. [read post]
29 May 2016, 5:20 am
Yet, his decision in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 11:31 am
It is a lose-lose. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
On 19 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:49 pm
This is true even when the contractor suffers loses allegedly caused by the design professional. [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:49 pm
This is true even when the contractor suffers loses allegedly caused by the design professional. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:57 am
,United States v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 9:01 pm
In an early case, Willingham v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:35 am
Not for nothing did she lose today's case, just as she fumbled away (in a mistrial) the one before.Today's outcomes have many lessons. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:22 am
The procedural theory for such a result would be that Foster was not free to reopen the jury-selection issue after losing on it in an earlier challenge in state courts. [read post]
23 May 2016, 9:22 am
Starbucks, Kraft Foods Tassimo Pod Suit Dismissal Affirmed by Sixth Circuit In Montgomery v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:10 am
I always find it fascinating when lawyers become the plaintiff-clients yet still lose their cases. [read post]
22 May 2016, 8:47 am
In Hickey v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 3:01 pm
Doctor A testified that a person in a nitrogen-induced hypoxic state would lose consciousness quickly, and the heart would cease to beat within a few minutes. [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:11 am
Finally, Lord Toulson’s dissenting judgment agreed with the Court of Appeal that the injunction should not continue, stating that “the court needs to be very cautious about granting an injunction preventing publication of what is widely known, if it is not to lose public respect for the law by giving the appearance of being out of touch with reality“. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:33 pm
The PATA states that New York law governs the interpretation of its terms, J.A. 219, and under that law we review the District Court’s interpretation of the PATA de novo, Dreisinger v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 4:36 pm
In Amorin v. [read post]
