Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 5961 - 5980 of 21,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2013, 1:15 pm by Pierre Bergeron
  The Court considered a number of alternatives in terms of how to evaluate finality in this context, but ultimately opted for a bright line test. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 9:52 pm
The court found: “The test for whether trademark infringement has occurred is identical to the test for whether false designation of origin has occurred. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Lachlan Murdoch’s defamation proceedings against Crikey promised to be a test case on the new public interest defence. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
In typical injury cases, to hold a negligent party accountable, a plaintiff must file suit within two years of the date of the injury. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 7:00 am
Last Friday, July 20th, the Texas Supreme Court denied the plaintiff taxpayer's petition for review of the Court of Appeals' decision in DuPont Photomasks, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 7:10 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
GENDERSON, Williams & Connolly, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by William Ford, Margaret Taylor
Like the plaintiffs in Raines, McCarthy and co. have not been singled out for any “specially unfavorable treatment. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:21 pm
Koch, No. 1-06-3552 (2-10-09), affirmed a decision which stated that the defendant, a radiologist, is entitled to summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's cause of action for wrongful death after plaintiff's decedent volunteered to participate in a test of new CT equipment and software at the hospital where he was employed and defendant, after accidentally coming across scan, repeatedly warned plaintiff's decedent to see a cardiologist immediately,… [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:24 pm by Kevin F. Brady
Issues Presented: (i)         whether plaintiffs are entitled to a declaration, pursuant to 8 Del. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 7:49 am by Eric Goldman
This theory of likelihood of confusion is evaluated under the same six-prong test laid out above. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 10:26 am by Boris
In so determining, the Court briefly analyzed the public policy prong of the reasonableness test in general terms. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:48 am by Abbe Gluck
The 2012 plaintiffs – represented by the same lawyer in King – even argued that the entire Affordable Care Act should have been struck down without the subsidies, because it could not function without them. [read post]
21 May 2021, 9:06 am by Georges Legrand
In that case, since the amount of time the plaintiff spent working on his employer’s vessels as opposed to his land-based work was unclear, the court remanded the case so that the appropriate principles could be applied to the facts. [read post]
21 May 2021, 9:06 am by Georges Legrand
In that case, since the amount of time the plaintiff spent working on his employer’s vessels as opposed to his land-based work was unclear, the court remanded the case so that the appropriate principles could be applied to the facts. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am by Eugene Volokh
[So the California Court of Appeal has held, concluding that there is enough of a factual dispute (under California's plaintiff-friendly pleading standards) for the case to go forward.] [read post]