Search for: ""Terry v. Ohio" OR "392 U.S. 1"" Results 41 - 60 of 123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2014, 3:51 pm by owner
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), where the United States Supreme Court held that an officer may conduct a brief stop or detention of a person based on a reasonable suspicion consisting of specific and articulable facts that the person detained is involved in criminal activity. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:38 pm by Michael J. Petro
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 30, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), police may conduct a brief, investigatory traffic stop if they have reasonable suspicion based on articulable facts that a crime is about to be or has been committed. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:34 am by Susan Brenner
Ohio392 U.S. 1 (1968), law enforcement officers may conduct investigatory stops of persons or vehicles if they have a `reasonable suspicion that criminal activity has occurred, is occurring, or is about to occur. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:56 pm
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 and its progeny, and constituted an unlawful search. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:53 am
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20 (1968)("[T]he police must, whenever practicable, obtain advance judicial approval of searches and seizures through the warrant procedure. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 5:41 am by adamengel
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), police officers may briefly detain individuals in order to investigate possible criminal activity. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:26 pm by Bryan Thompson
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) or as part of a community caretaking function, the trial court disagreed, quashing the arrest, while the state appealed.A community caretaking exception applies “where (1) the officer is performing a function other than the investigation of a crime, and (2) the search or seizure was reasonable because it was undertaken to protect the safety of the general public. [read post]