Search for: "*barrow v. at & T"
Results 41 - 60
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2006, 7:22 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 9:44 am
’ (Barrow v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm
Sewell v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:27 am
Sewell v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 5:03 am
Nov. 26, 2018); Barrow v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County, No. 07-5180 In a case brought by a police officer alleging that, after an altercation at a bar while he was off duty, he was unlawfully required to take the breathalyzer test in violation of his constitutional rights, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) under a totality-of-the-circumstances analysis, plaintiff was not seized when he submitted to the breathalyzer test, but was only afraid he would be terminated or suspended… [read post]
3 May 2008, 9:28 am
In Katz v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:49 am
The 1st District faced a similar situation in Cargile v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 2:25 pm
Ritz-Carlton Hotel Co., LLC, 977 F.3d 1039, 1046 (11th Cir. 2020); see also Barrows v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 6:43 am
In Walsh v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 7:15 am
In Tiger Lily v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:38 am
(I don’t understand why the opinion refers to “computer fraud” rather than transmitting code and damaging a protected computer in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:03 pm
See Barrow v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:39 pm
(Sounds a lot like the rule at issue in New York State Rifle Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:23 am
Related information: McCormick v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
[15] Does the litigant have a possible ulterior motive—whether personal or political—that isn't visible from the court papers? [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
The case of Ironside v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:58 am
In Georgia, [t]he standards applicable to motions for summary judgment are announced in Lau's Corp. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
The three Democrats voting for the bill included: Representative Mike Ross (D-AR), Jim Matheson (D-UT) and John Barrow (D-GA). [read post]
