Search for: "*fail v. Sears, Roebuck and Co"
Results 41 - 60
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2012, 7:10 am
In that case, Lisa Learmonth sued Sears, Roebuck and Co. after she was in a collision with one of the company's vans near Philadelphia, Miss., in 2005. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:10 am
In that case, Lisa Learmonth sued Sears, Roebuck and Co. after she was in a collision with one of the company's vans near Philadelphia, Miss., in 2005. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:21 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 727 F.3d 796 (7th Cir. 2013) and Pella Corp. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 9:50 am
Sears, Roebuck, and Co., 192 F. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Merck & Co., 2007 WL 2493917 (N.J. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:06 pm
" Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:52 pm
In Sears Roebuck & Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 7:03 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 563 F.Supp.2d 832 (N.D. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:22 am
It found this case similar to Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:40 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:17 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 358 So.2d 926, 930 (La.1978); see also La. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 1:39 am
Sears Roebuck & Co. as a point of departure for judicial interpretations of sex segregation in the workplace. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:53 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 836 F.2d 515 (Fed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:47 am
Sears Wins Dismissal of Class Action Over Kmart Merger The American Lawyer The plaintiffs in a long-running class action against Sears, Roebuck & Co. over its merger with Kmart had reason to be optimistic: Their case survived a motion to dismiss, and they won class certification. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 3:08 pm
Sears, Roebuck and Co.). 3. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:15 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 727 F.3d 796, 799 (7th Cir.2013) (construing Comcast as holding only “that a damages suit cannot be certified to proceed as a class action unless the damages sought are the result of the class-wide injury that the suit alleges” (emphasis in original)); Leyva v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:31 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 547 F.3d 742 (7th Cir. 2008), observing that by ensuring that the class action is premised on the realistic prospect of a remedy that the class members could not otherwise obtain, the court is also protecting the interests of absent class members, who may have different interests than those of class action lawyers who want to obtain a fee for providing the same or similar relief. [read post]
Court of Appeal delivers stunnig rebuke of misclassification certification opinions based on Brinker
27 Jan 2014, 10:37 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co. (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 974, 154 Cal.Rptr.3d 480; Mora v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
588 P.2d at 340-41 (“Plaintiff has failed to show inadequacy of [the] warnings”). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542,1548 (Fed. [read post]
