Search for: "*u. S. v. Strickland"
Results 41 - 60
of 78
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2012, 6:25 pm
Alvarado, 541 U. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am
Rosenthal (Chapman University) The Role of Age and a Minor's Consent to Search under the Fourth Amendment *Megan Annitto (West Virginia University) GPS Tracking into Fourth Amendment Dead Ends: The Katz Conundrum *Fabio Arcila (Touro Law Center) Searches, Evidence, and Privacy *Ellen Marrus (University of Houston) Criminal Justice 07: Right to Counsel Time: Thu, Jun 7 - 4:30pm - 6:15pm Place: HHV, TBA20 Session Participants: Chair: Stewart M Young (University… [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm
Daman v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:53 pm
S. 545, 561 (1977); and Santobello v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:53 pm
See Strickland v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:52 pm
See Strickland v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
Strickland v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
In 2008, the Sixth Circuit found in Phelps-Roper v Strickland (22 August 2008) that a similar law to those struck down this year was valid. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
In fact, this was precisely the defendant’s claim in the seminal ineffective assistance case, Strickland v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:15 pm
S. 129, 131 (1968), and Brookhart v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:17 pm
The Supreme Court set out the test of effectiveness in Strickland v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 9:58 am
As you recall, Strickland v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
” Strickland v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Judging cruelty 44 U C Davis Law Rev 81 (2010). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Barber: The court overruled State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:52 pm
Justice Ginsburg's concurrence was much more mild: To prevail under the prejudice requirement of Strickland v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
It all ties together.The standards created by Strickland and §2254(d) are both "highly deferential," id., at 689; Lindh v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
That the AEDPA (anti terrorism and effective death penalty act) requires federal courts to give state courts great deference in interpreting the law, and that great deference combined with the fact that the supreme court has never held that a failure to give a closing argument is ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:04 pm
Padilla v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
