Search for: "103 Fashion Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2017, 4:47 pm by Stephen Page
Recently I presented at the seventh annual Family Law Forum run by Legalwise in Brisbane about third party property settlement issues. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:49 am by Peter Mahler
” In Matter of Kemp & Beatley, Inc., the landmark 1984 decision defining minority shareholder oppression, New York’s highest court in dicta observed that “[a] court has broad latitude in fashioning alternative relief,” citing with approval a 1973 Oregon Supreme Court ruling that featured a laundry list of alternative remedies in dissolution cases including an order requiring the corporation or a majority of its stockholders to purchase the stock of… [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:04 am
Although the Board rarely takes it upon itself to fashion un-argued grounds for reversal, it is the Board's prerogative. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:26 am
Although the Board rarely takes it upon itself to fashion un-argued grounds for reversal, it is the Board's prerogative. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
  I am going to proceed in this post in a fashion that differs in one respect from how I usually translate a court’s opinion into a blog post:  I usually go through the entire opinion, explaining what the court did and why. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:04 pm
" (This document was identified as "Full translation of Schafer (DE 298 10 798 U1), Schreiber Translations, Inc., May 2010. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:18 pm
" (This document was identified as "Full translation of Schafer (DE 298 10 798 U1), Schreiber Translations, Inc., May 2010. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:28 am
The goods in the applications reinforced the conclusion that the marks uniquely and unmistakably point to Kate Middleton, because she was known as a fashion trendsetter. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 6:04 am
 Category: 103   By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor  TitleScientific Plastic Prod., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 103(a) is a question of law reviewed de novo. [read post]