Search for: "2-13-18-1 Garcia"
Results 41 - 60
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
Heinz CompanyCase number: 13-cv-1080 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: February 25, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 2, 2014 04/22/2014 07/21/2014 2014-42 In the Matter of Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.Administrative Proceeding File No. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:04 pm
United States, 527 U.S. 1, 18 (1999). [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Polk, No. 072425 Sentence of fifteen years and eight months incarceration for attempting to produce child pornography is affirmed where: 1) there was no gross disproportionality between the fifteen-year mandatory minimum term of imprisonment established by 18 U.S.C. section 2251(e) and the offense of which the defendant was convicted; and 2) the defendant's Eighth Amendment challenge failed. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:50 pm
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 2014 FCA 173 SOCAN Tariffs 22.D.1 – Audiovisual webcasts and 22.D.2 – Audiovisual user-generated content for the years 2007 to 2013, Copyright Board July 18, 2014 Geophysical Service Incorporated v Nwest Energy Corp 2014 ABQB 205 Hayward Industries inc. c. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:35 am
Lexis ID and Password Required for Online Access: 1. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:51 am
Ray Garcia, Esq. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
JUANITA PEREZ, VIRGINIA GARCIA, PAUL ZAPATA, AND SYLVIA SANCHEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ALL HEIRS OF ELISA ZAPATA, DECEASED, No. 13-0573 (Tex. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
JUANITA PEREZ, VIRGINIA GARCIA, PAUL ZAPATA, AND SYLVIA SANCHEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ALL HEIRS OF ELISA ZAPATA, DECEASED; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-13-00111-CV,406 SW3d 313, 06-26-13) 13-0576 THE WILLIAMSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 11:56 am
Ct., Oneida Cty., Notes of Testimony of David Rosner, Mar. 18, 2017 (Press Release from Plaintiffs’ law firm). 2 Quester v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
United States, 19-5749, Lara-Garcia v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:18 pm
COMMERCIAL LAW 2. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:28 pm
There were between 2 to 5 live mice observed inside the egg laying Houses 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 14. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:17 pm
On Friday 20 June 2014 there will be a PTR in the case of Garcia v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 6:06 am
Lexis ID and Password Required for Online Access: 1. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
COVID-19 PANDEMIC ■ Joffre Garcia (Deceased), Applicant v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 6:54 am
"REGIONALLicensed for a gun - at 10 - thisisdorset.co.uk 1/2/08"Children as young as 10 have been issued with shotgun licences by Dorset Police.More than 100 licences for guns have been issued to young people under 18 in the last two years. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Louis bank during an attempted robbery, the judgment is affirmed over three primary claims of error regarding: 1) whether a Batson challenge to the prosecution's peremptory strike of a prospective juror, an African American woman, was improperly rejected; 2) findings on two statutory aggravating factors, "pecuniary gain" and "conviction for two felony drug offenses"; 3) a refusal to bifurcate the penalty phase; 4) denial of a motion to suppress; 5) denial… [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm
We have added the Quizmaster’s comments in italics. (1) Put these ten events from 2014 into chronological order : (x) Commencement of the privacy trial involving Paul Weller’s children, 24 March (iii) The CJEU’s decision in Google Spain v AEPD and Mario Costeja González, 13 May (viii) Warby J being sworn in as a High Court judge 10 June (ix) The sentencing of Andy Coulson, 4 July (iv) Bean J giving judgment in OPO v MLA &… [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Hendry, No. 06-5118 Sentence calculation for entering the United States after having been lawfully deported following a conviction of an aggravated felony is affirmed over claims that: 1) the existence of "fast-track-programs" in some districts but not others not only created unwarranted disparities but also violated the parsimony provision of 18 U.S.C. section 3553(a); and 2) the sentencing court placed too much weight on the Guidelines, to the exclusion of… [read post]
