Search for: "7th Level Communications, LLC" Results 41 - 60 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
All case summaries below  are from the FindLaw Weekly Opinion Summaries, August 27 through August 31,  2007. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
” Expert witnesses often attempt to bootstrap their causation opinions by reference to determinations of regulatory agencies that are couched in similar language, but which use different quality and quantity of evidence than is required in the scientific community or in civil courts. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm by Vercammen Law
 Rooming House Act did not apply to Assisted Living Facility here ESTATE OF JAMES BURNS, by and through BRIAN BURNS, EXECUTOR,v CARE ONE AT STANWICK, LLC d/b/a CARE ONE HARMONY VILLAGE AT MOORESTOWN and CARE ONE, LLC,SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISIONDOCKET NO. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
  As to “protected computer,” the judge began by explaining that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act defines protected computer, in relevant part, as a computer `which is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or communication, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication of the United States. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am by Schachtman
Ohio 2006) (reducing all studies to one level, and treating all criticisms as though they rendered all studies invalid). 6 Id. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Mercexchange LLC, 547 U.S. 388, 126 S.Ct. 1837 (SCOTUS 2006): Established test for granting injunctive relief in patent cases. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:47 am by Bona Law PC
Injury to competition generally is found at the level of a rival to the discriminating seller (“primary line injury”) or of the disfavored customer (“secondary line injury”). [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) OHIM Board of Appeal rules on functional designs: R 690/2007-3 (Class 99) X5 and CEO Are they still riding side by side – Munich District Court and Turin District Court draw deviating conclusions in design dispute (Class 99) USPTO’s transparency puts Europe to shame (IAM) EU community patent and UPLS: Will there be a political breakthrough soon? [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(IP Think Tank) Discussion regarding ‘WIPO Intellectual Property Indicators 2009’ (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IP finance) (IP finance) How many ministers does it take to make a High Level Segment? [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
The Veritas Healthcare Solutions LLC, ARB No. 14-002, ALJ No. 2013-LCA-5 (ARB Feb. 27, 2015), the Complainant argued that the Respondent’s deposition requests should have complied with the Hague Convention. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Sajar Plastics[7th Cir.]o 7th Defines Who Is A Supervisor Under Title VIIAndonissany v. [read post]
The bill was passed with overwhelming bipartisan, bicameral support, as well as backing from the business community. [read post]
The bill was passed with overwhelming bipartisan, bicameral support, as well as backing from the business community. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
And so it is remarkable that a President who campaigned as an economic populist would nominate judges like Neil Gorsuch and now Brett Kavanaugh to the Court.[13] On one level, Judge Kavanaugh’s appointment is a fair bit more important than that of Justice Gorsuch, because of the seat he would fill.[14] Admittedly, Justice Kennedy was no great antitrust hawk. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Bill Marler
Salmonella, E. coli, and other bacteria can grow to high levels without affecting the appearance of the sprouts. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 5:50 am by Bill Marler
Salmonella, E. coli, and other bacteria can grow to high levels without affecting the appearance of the sprouts. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 09-233 Title: Triple-S Management Corporation v. [read post]