Search for: "ADIDAS AG" Results 41 - 60 of 142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2017, 2:32 am
Adidas AG also failed with its claim that the three-striped mark had acquired distinctiveness through use based despite the 12,000 pages of evidence. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:30 pm
Tibbie McIntyre reports on The 1709 Blog on a number of items, including the declaration of fair use filed by the Andy Warhol estate against Lynn Goldsmith regarding Warhol’s Prince Series; the settlement reached by singer Ed Sheeran and songwriters Martin Harrington and Thomas Leonard in connection with the song ‘Photograph’; the case Mavrix Photographs v LiveJournal, No. 14-56596, which considered whether the safe harbor defense applies to moderators who review infringing content… [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
” [para 72]One of the artworks that Oslo municipality is trying to have registered as a trade mark:The Angry Boy (Sinnataggen)The rationale of the various absolute grounds for refusal of registrationAccording to the Court this also follows from consideration of how Article 3(1)(b) to (e) of the Trade Mark Directive acknowledges the need to keep a sign available for general use [para 73, referring to paragraphs 33 ff in the 2008 Opinion of AG Ruiz-Járabo… [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 4:58 am
Christian Faith Fellowship Church v. adidas AG, 841 F.3d 986, 120 USPQ2d 1640 (Fed. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 1:33 pm by Nikki Siesel
The Christian Faith Fellowship Church (the “Church” or “Appellant”) takes on Goliath, Adidas AG, the apparel giant (“Adidas” or the “Appellee”). [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 1:33 pm by Nikki Siesel
The Christian Faith Fellowship Church (the “Church” or “Appellant”) takes on Goliath, Adidas AG, the apparel giant (“Adidas” or the “Appellee”). [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 3:58 am
*Now who's going to promote the Adidas tracksuit?! [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 11:37 am by Ron Coleman
Christian Faith Fellowship Church v. adidas AG, Appeal No. 2016-1296 (Fed. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:08 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The outcome of the case before the CAFC, Christian Faith Fellowship beats Adidas:Christian Faith Fellowship Church appeals a final judgment of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board that, in response to a petition filed by adidas AG, cancelled its trademarks for failing to use the marks in commerce before registering them. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
This was an appeal from the United States District Court for theMiddle District of Florida in No. 3:11-cv-00819-TJC-JRK,Judge Timothy J. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
| Napp v Dr Reddy's and Sandoz.Never too late 86 [week ending on Sunday 6 March] – Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 41 | The IPKat team: news, new arrivals and farewells | CJEU in Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v Adidas and OHIM | World IP day | Advocate General's opinion in Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe in Austro-Mechana | EPO v trade union | OLG Munich on YouTube liability |… [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:59 am
| Napp v Dr Reddy's and Sandoz.Never too late 86 [week ending on Sunday 6 March] – Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 41 | The IPKat team: news, new arrivals and farewells | CJEU in Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v Adidas and OHIM | World IP day | Advocate General's opinion in Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe in Austro-Mechana | EPO v trade union | OLG Munich on YouTube liability | UPC… [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:12 am
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
* Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe caseThis is about the Court of Justice of the European Union's (CJEU) decision in Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v Adidas and OHIM [Case C‑396/15 P], another trade mark case upon parallel stripes and shoes. [read post]