Search for: "ADOPTION OF D J V"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,907
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
I’d probably offer excerpts from all of the different opinions in that case to offer the students a comprehensive view of where things sit today. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 4:30 pm
See for example A and B v Rotherham MBC where a child was moved from a potential adoptive placement where he was settled, to live with his aunt. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 12:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:20 am
In December 2012, just before Christmas, and just before this Kat rejoined the blogging team, Arnold J handed down the decision Microsoft Corp v Motorola Mobility LLC [2012] EWHC 3677 (Pat) (21 December 2012). [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
D. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:55 am
" OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) (3). [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 5:14 am
Beau J. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:05 pm
In this set of short wins, the one that I'd like to call attention to is United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
Dawn J. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
See Leslie v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
He concluded: "The dispute at trial concerned integer D. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 8:04 am
(D. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
Clarke, Docket 15-1500, J. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
In this regard, Murray J noted at [25] (in comments adopted by Nicol J at [32]): “Warby J noted in LJY at [33]-[37] that repeated threats to publish private information amounting to a course of conduct could amount to harassment, provided that it is calculated to cause alarm or distress and is oppressive and that it is unacceptable to a degree that would sustain criminal liability. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm
Judgment Warby J cited the relevant principles on meaning from paras 11 to 12 of Koutsogiannis v The Random House Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 48 (QB). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
Moreover, the exercise of constitutional rights “may be regulated by the Oireachtas when the common good requires this” (Ryan v Attorney General [1965] IR 294, 312 (HC; Kenny J) affd [1965] IR 294, 345, [1965] IESC 1 (3 July 1965) [23] (Ó Dálaigh CJ; Lavery, Kingsmill Moore, Haugh and Walsh JJ concurring); see, recently, Burke v Minister for Education [2022] IESC 1 (24 January 2022) [95]… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:03 pm
In Díaz-Alarcón v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Appx. 817, 818 (2d Cir. 2010) (applying Arizona law); D’Agnese v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:24 pm
" The article examines the New York Court of Appeals decision in Shondel J. v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 2:23 pm
In what was no doubt a déjà vu moment, the appellate court recounted its holding in Environmental Planning & Information Council v. [read post]
