Search for: "ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED "
Results 41 - 60
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2011, 2:32 pm
As long as it does, so will legislative and judicial efforts to control, limit, or end asbestos litigation. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 4:57 am
"Defendants sued in Madison County typically are directly connected to that county by virtue of having their principal place of business, a sales office, corporate headquarters, warehouse, factory or distribution center there", Cooney insisted, but this could not be further from the truth as far as asbestos lawsuits are concerned. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 11:44 am
Titeflex Corporation Over 2,000 Lawsuits Filed Against Dialysis Drug Maker in Massachusetts District Court [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
” For that reason, “[p]unitive awards in asbestos cases usually do not punish the individuals who were responsible for the offensive conduct,” but instead “inflict harm on current shareholders, customers, and employees” of the defendant corporation. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 3:22 pm
DAP limits the number of potential settling defendants to asbestos mines and, possibly, distributors of raw fiber. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am
Evidence that the Maritime Commission had warned Bethlehem Steel about the hazards of asbestosis, and to maintain a threshold limit value of 5 million particles per cubic foot, was not particularly germane or helpful in avoiding mesothelioma among employees. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 1:08 pm
Burnham became the target of more than 30,000 asbestos-related claims. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 7:52 pm
CBS Corporation In Duffy v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:34 am
Most of the defendants settled, but Ford Corporation tried the case against the plaintiff’s widow. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:50 am
Feb. 21, 2013), the California Supreme Court unequivocally and unanimously laid to rest the assertion that dissolved foreign corporations may be sued in California after the time of the statute of limitations provided by the laws under which the foreign corporations were incorporated. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 8:38 pm
When a corporate entity is simultaneously an employer and a manufacturer of harmful products, workers’ compensation serves to limit its tort liability with respect to its employees. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 7:52 pm
CBS Corporation In Duffy v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 6:20 pm
As to the corporate decision argument, the appellate court already decided that was not the correct focus, since it was not the exposure to asbestos. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:25 am
Parent corporations often externalize the risk of tort liability through legally separate subsidiaries. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:20 am
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, the court allowed the plaintiff’s case to proceed against the defendant manufacturer even though the asbestos-containing part causing the plaintiff’s injuries was not manufactured by the defendant. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:28 pm
Reply Brief You can read an article about the decision in the Palm Beach Post [Florida Supreme Court rejects asbestos claim limit] and the Daily Business Review [Florida Supreme Court throws out 2005 asbestos law]. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:14 am
App. 3d 902 (1986), held that Section 2010 of the California Corporations Code prevails over foreign corporation laws that limit survival periods of dissolved corporations. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
Starting in 1964, Johns-Manville Corporation, the major manufacturer of asbestos-containing insulation, started warning. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:55 am
Grace & Corporation Armstrong World Industries Johns-Manville Celotex Corporation Fibreboard Corporation National Gypsum Corporation Flintkote Company Unarco Southwest Electric Power Company Throughout the past century, asbestos had been manufacturers' favorite material, with more than 3.000 products containing the mineral at the time. [read post]
