Search for: "Adams v. Cox" Results 41 - 60 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Erin Cox for The Washington Post. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am by Harold Hongju Koh
Adam Cox, Ryan Goodman and Cristina Rodriguez well described the court’s standard: “[E]ven if we know that an immigration policy was motivated by blatant official animus against a religion, the policy should be sustained so long as the government proffers some rational national security basis for it. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am by Adam Feldman
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 9:08 am by Immigration Prof
As readers digest the implications of the Supreme Court's decision in Jennings v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am by Marty Lederman
By Adam Cox, Marty Lederman and Cristina RodriguezOne month ago, on September 5, the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, rescindeda June 2012 memorandum issued by her predecessor, Secretary Janet Napolitano, which had established the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, commonly known as “DACA. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary on the guidelines comes from Adam Cox and Ryan Goodman at Just Security, Leah Litman at Take Care, and Marty Lederman at Just Security here and here. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
Analysis of the term comes from Adam Winkler in The Washington Post. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:48 am by Peter Spiro
Adam Cox and Jack Chin try to peg the cases to the retrograde constitutional contexts in which the cases were handed down, but they were not simply a reflection of their times. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The press was united in horror this week, reacting to the news that Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered outside a constituency surgery. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am by Peter Margulies
As Adam Cox and Cristina Rodriguez conceded in a recent Yale Law Journal article, Family Fairness recipients already had a path to a legal status under the INA, once their IRCA beneficiary relatives became lawful permanent residents (LPRs). [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 9:55 am by Andrew Hamm
  Speakers will include Josh Blackman, Adam Cox, Cristina Rodriguez, and Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:24 am by Andrew Hamm
  Speakers will include Josh Blackman, Adam Cox, Cristina Rodriguez, and Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 Thus, in their closing post, symposium conveners Adam Cox and Cristina Rodriguez expressed surprise that the work authorization question had so quickly "receded" from both sides of the debate; one reason for this, they surmised, was that the question "quickly came to be seen as a matter of straightforward statutory delegation. [read post]