Search for: "Aetna Casualty " Results 41 - 60 of 110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
  [W]e must review the record in light of these obvious information costs”); Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm by Schachtman
Aetna Casualty & Surety, 505 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir. 1974) (noting disapprovingly that, evidence consisted “largely of hearsay, propaganda, speculation, and conjecture”). [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 7:03 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Here are a couple of examples: In the 1987, Texas Supreme Court case, Aetna Casualty and Surety v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
  Name Address Reported By NYS DEPARTMENT OF STATE CERTIFICATION UNIT 123 WILLIAM ST NEW YORK NY 10038 ROPES & GRAY LLP NYS DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVIS 99 WASHINGTON AVENUE, 6TH FLR ALBANY NY 12231 STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO NYS DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE P O BOX 4127 BINGHAMTON NY 13902 NATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC Other public employers and employee… [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 4:57 am by Mike Aylward
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 230 A.2d 21 (Conn. 1967)] fail to provide a decisive answer. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:53 pm by Rick E. Rayl
  That might in fact be true, and it is indeed the holding of Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 5:40 am by Stanley D. Baum
After paying disability benefits for a number of years, the Plan's insurer- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company ("Lumbermens")- stopped paying disability benefits to Aschermann based on the "any job" standard in the Plan, on the grounds that she could do sedentary work. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:48 am by Stanley D. Baum
Aetna Life Insurance Company, No. 12-1230 (7th Cir. 2012), the plaintiff, Carol Aschermann ("Aschermann"), had worked for AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals as a sales representative. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:35 pm by Jody Nathan
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., which  held that “an occurrence is determined by the cause or causes of the resulting injury. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:04 pm by Linda A. Kerns, Esquire
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 370 U.S. 159 (1962) which established a three part test as to whether veterans’ disability payments retain their exempt status: (1) funds must be “readily available as needed for support and maintenance;”  (2) funds must “actually retain the qualities of money;” and  (3) funds must “have not been converted to permanent investments. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:04 pm by Linda A. Kerns, Esquire
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 370 U.S. 159 (1962) which established a three part test as to whether veterans’ disability payments retain their exempt status: (1) funds must be “readily available as needed for support and maintenance;”  (2) funds must “actually retain the qualities of money;” and  (3) funds must “have not been converted to permanent investments. [read post]
3 May 2012, 6:37 pm by bvertz
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 370 U.S. 159 (1962), which established a three-pronged test for sheltering a veteran’s accumulated disability benefits in an account. [read post]