Search for: "Aiken v. Aiken" Results 41 - 60 of 204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm by Lila Sevener
More recently, however, Judge Ann Aiken in the Oregon District Court has shown an eagerness to take Massachusetts v. [read post]
Notably, CMS and OIG propose to expressly exclude, or are seeking comments regarding whether to exclude, certain entities from participating in protected arrangements on the basis of historical enforcement and oversight experience: (i) pharmaceutical manufacturers; (ii) manufacturers, distributors, or suppliers of durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS); (iii) laboratories; (iv) pharmacy benefit managers; and (v) other wholesalers and distributors. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 7:55 am by Deborah Heller
Clark contested that the elements of standing from Massachusetts v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  We've previously noted Zachary Newkirk’s "Full Justice May Be Done Them": The Case of Bill, Charles, Jupiter, Randolph, et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 9:44 am by Michael A. Conforti
The panel held that the defendants did not satisfy the five Bauman factors required for a writ of mandamus, Bauman v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 12:27 pm by Lyle Denniston
Aiken to dismiss the case as beyond the powers of a court. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:27 am by Lyle Denniston
In fact, Judge Aiken in her opinion in the Oregon case quoted this guidance from Kennedy’s same-sex marriage ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]