Search for: "Amendment to Fla. Rules of Appellate Procedure" Results 41 - 60 of 185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am by Nathaniel Sobel
Waldrip, the district court ruled that boycotts against Israel, as defined by the statute, are not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 6:28 pm by Law Lady
Weekly D167bCivil procedure -- Default -- Vacation -- Jurisdiction -- Circuit court appellate division departed from essential requirements of law in ruling that county court lacked jurisdiction to sua sponte reconsider default final judgment and vacate the default one day after judgment was rendered -- Trial court is permitted to sua sponte order rehearing or new trial within ten days after entry of judgment -- Further, circuit court applied wrong standard in reviewing… [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:51 pm by Dan Bushell
” The Court then referred Citibank's counsel to the applicable Miami-Dade administrative order (10-E), In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 44 So. 3d 555, 557-58 (Fla. 2010), and reversed the order canceling the foreclosure sale with instructions to consider whether sanctions should be imposed. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 10:34 am
The Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit is requested to serve a response to the above-referenced petition on on or before January 6, 2011, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(e)(3). [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
 State appealed and appellate court reversed. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm by Jim Jenkins
The appellate court found that, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.600(b)(8) and the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
The appellate court found that, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.600(b)(8) and the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 12:35 pm by Juan C. Antúnez
While the amended complaint generally alleged fraud and “embezzlement,” the facts asserted by Appellant were that the PR failed to provide him with sufficient accountings to explain all expenditures, leading Appellant to the conclusion that estate funds had been removed without explanation. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
RIVERA'S RULE 3.850 MOTION WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am by Welcome
Circuit Court, 4th Judicial Circuit (Appellate) in and for Duval County. [read post]