Search for: "Amendments To The Florida Rules of Traffic Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2015, 5:35 am
” The court ruled that the search of the pill box in the passenger's purse “requires reasonable suspicion that an individual has committed or is about to commit a crime . . . . [read post]
10 May 2014, 9:25 am
California, 188 L.Ed. 2d 680, April 22, 2014, ruled that an anonymous report of a traffic violation justified the stop of a vehicle. [read post]
7 May 2019, 9:06 am
And with that, the Florida Legislature wraps up another session in Tallahassee. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 9:22 am
Gorsuch expressed surprise that the Vermont Supreme Court had decided the case without referring to Florida v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 7:36 am
Supreme Court has ruled that in most cases, if a police officer wishes to draw a blood sample and does not have your consent, a warrant must first be obtained. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a pair of cases out of Florida involving the use of drug sniffing dogs. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:54 pm
The Florida Supreme Court ruled that parents could not waive their children's right to sue - but added that the lawmakers could pass such a law. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 11:40 am
Florida Supreme Court – Criminal Headnotes – August 30, 2018 STATE OF FLORIDA V. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:41 pm
The Florida Supreme Court ruled that police needed to have a probable cause belief in wrongdoing before they could use the dog at the home, on the premise that the drug sniff was a “search” under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:37 am
Next, the trial court granted the estate’s motion to amend its complaint to include punitive damages. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 5:57 am
This law is not just a set of rules but a vital safeguard for the lives of emergency and service personnel who work in potentially hazardous roadside environments. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:27 pm
PAM BONDI and RICK SWEARINGEN, filed suit seeking a ruling from the United States Distict Court for the Northern District of Florida that the law is unconstitutional and that the chief persons in charge of enforcing that law be prevented from doing so. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:12 am
The second petition at the Supreme Court is City Of Pensacola, Florida v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
But the Federal Patent Court still did not find the patent novel and inventive over the prior art even if limited to push notifications.Motorola can and presumably will appeal yesterday's ruling to the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH, Federal Court of Justice). [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:08 pm
A Florida appellate court in 2016 cited this precedent. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:00 pm
Supreme Court case, Florida v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 3:55 pm
The Florida Supreme Court held that a Fourth Amendment search had occurred without a warrant when the dog sniffed at the door. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
The Tampa court added that the exclusion of expert testimony is generally the exception, since Rule 702 was amended to reflect United States Supreme Court precedent in Daubert. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:28 pm
Similarly, the Court of Appeal ruled that the woman’s confession of judgment claim must also be reconsidered. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:54 pm
Florida v. [read post]
