Search for: "Amin v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2012, 9:49 am
These were most famously set out by Lord Bingham in by the House of Lords in R (Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC HL [at 31]: The purposes of such an investigation are clear: to ensure so far as possible that the full facts are brought to light; that culpable and discreditable conduct is exposed and brought to public notice; that suspicion of deliberate wrongdoing (if justified) is allayed; that dangerous practices and… [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Mohammed Mark Amin, Robert Reza Amin, Michael Mahmood Amin, Sam Saeed Pirnazar, Mary Teresa Coley, and Ali Tashakori Case number: 12-cv-3960 (United States District Court for the Central District of California) Case filed: May 8, 2012 Qualifying Judgment/Order: June 1, 2012 08/01/2012 10/30/2012 2012-81 In the Matter of Harbinger Capital Partners, LLC … [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 2:12 am
Richardson v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:59 pm
And maybe he is.But it was John Roberts, no fan of my clients, who wrote this a couple of years ago in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 6:10 am
As Ben noted last month, Judge Bates recently has shown some interest in possibly moving the Boumediene-at-Bagram case, Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:36 pm
ELKHORN CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Wyoming corporation.ELKHORN CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Wyoming corporation v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:50 am
They based their claim on Article 3 but relied by analogy on the high duty to investigate that arose under article 2 of the ECHR when a suicide had occurred as illustrated in R(Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Office [2003] and in R (L (A Patient)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] AC 588. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:18 am
El-Amin v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 7:48 am
A few weeks ago, a Seventh Circuit en banc panel held oral arguments in Vance v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
Apart from its import for U.S. detention policy generally, the development, if true, may have bearing on the factual underpinnings in Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:16 pm
Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:29 pm
The program will also include a panel of IP experts such as Tara Rosnell and Christopher V. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
On the other hand, “a disclaimer should not remove more than is necessary […] to restore novelty […]” (see G 1/03 [headnote 2.2] and [3]).[5.5.1] The second paragraph of G 1/03 [3] states“However, the only justification for the disclaimer is to exclude a novelty-destroying disclosure […]. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:24 pm
Supp. 33, 37 (D.D.C. 1988), where the district court stated that “the reexamination statute does not contemplate a ‘reex- amination’ of the sufficiency of a disclosure. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:09 pm
In Blanco v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:13 pm
AIR1980 SC 691, Jagannath Amin v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:30 pm
Dr Amin was the consultant for Mr Nassery during his hospital admissions. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 7:08 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Djanogly v Westminster City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 432 (19 April 2011) ZZ v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 440 (19 April 2011) Thorne v Courtier & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 460 (19 April 2011) CMA- CGM Marseille v Petro Broker International [2011] EWCA Civ 461 (19 April 2011) Sandhu (t/a Isher Fashions UK) v Jet Star Retail Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 459 (19 April 2011) Beedles… [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:49 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Harrison, R (on the application of) v Birmingham Magistrate’s Court & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 332 (25 March 2011) Secretary of State for the Home Department v MK (Tunisia) [2011] EWCA Civ 333 (25 March 2011) Brook v Reed [2011] EWCA Civ 331 (25 March 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Bowker & Anor (t/a Lagopus Services) v The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds [2011] EWHC 737 (QB) (25… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:01 am
DepositionsKF8901 .B63 2001Developing deposition skills : Polisi v. [read post]
