Search for: "Andrew Stone" Results 41 - 60 of 661
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2023, 7:29 am by SCOTUSblog
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Republicans Target Minority Scholarships After Supreme Court’s Affirmative Action Ruling (Tessa Stuart, Rolling Stone) SC’s attorney general, chief justice battled over federal election law ruling. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
On 27 June 2023 the House of Lords approved an amendment to the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill which aims to tackle “strategic litigation against public participation” (“SLAPPs”); the use of defamation law to silence critics. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
Andrew Baker J has remitted the decision to the governor. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On 15 June 2023, the Court of Appeal (Singh, Andrews and Warby LJJ) heard the claimant’s appeal in the case of Wright v McCormack. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 7:12 am
Now if you just look closely at the monument, you will see that about a quarter of the way up, the color of the stone changes, gets lighter. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
Andrew Green KC, who represents the Mirror, suggested that although the company’s journalists hacked the voicemails of numerous celebrities during the 2000s, there was no evidence that the Duke of Sussex was also target. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
  The defamation claim was brought by Andrew Bridgen MP against former health minister, Matt Hancock MP. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 5:52 am by David Pocklington
Comment “Coffin sliding” As we have noted earlier in Re St Andrew Horbling [2022] ECC Lin 2, in his outline of the legislation associated with “coffin sliding”, Bishop Ch. stated (emphasis added): “[10]. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
The disposal hearing followed an order by Sir Andrew Nicol, dated 22 October 2021 striking out the defence filed by each defendant and ordering judgement for the claimant. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Attacks on Dominion Voting Persist Despite High-Profile Lawsuits DNyuz – Stuart Thompson | Published: 4/6/2023 Claims that election software companies like Dominion Voting Systems sent helped orchestrate widespread fraud in the 2020 election have been widely debunked in the years since former President Trump and his allies first pushed the theories. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:45 am by Seán Binder
Sabrina Siddiqui and Andrew Restuccia report for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
The Data Protection and Digital Information (No.2) Bill was reintroduced into Parliament this week. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Mr Andrew Fulton KC, leading counsel for Mr Soriano, argued that the cardinal principle was that English law regarded it as wrong for a libel defendant to be given the opportunity to scour the books and records of the person he has defamed before particularising a defence [9]. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:33 am by Seán Binder
Steve Holland and Mike Stone report for Reuters. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 2:18 pm by Inu Manak
In other words, while the TBT or SPS Agreements may be “carved in stone” and are not (currently) being renegotiated, the foundation is being built on. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 2:18 pm by Inu Manak
In other words, while the TBT or SPS Agreements may be “carved in stone” and are not (currently) being renegotiated, the foundation is being built on. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 2:38 pm by Guest Author
Professor Tobias wishes to thank Margaret Sanner, Carley Ruival, Jane Baber, Katie Lehnen, and Jamie Wood for their valuable substantive and stylistic recommendations, the University of Richmond Law Library Staff, especially Paul Birch, Joyce Janto, and Alex Hutchings, for their excellent research, Yale Journal on Regulation Notice & Comment Editor Jacob Wirz for his excellent editorial efforts, Leslee Stone for her excellent processing, as well as Russell Williams and the… [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
Judge Andrew Edis said the Home Office “failed to make ‘adequate inquiries’” when it approved surveillance warrants from 2016-2019. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
The April 5 hearing by video will be held by federal Magistrate Judge Andrew M. [read post]