Search for: "Andrews v. State Board of Registration"
Results 41 - 60
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
Blurred Lines: Government Involvement in Corporate Internal Investigations and Implications for Individual Accountability Posted by Andrew Bauer, Jonathan Green, and Sara D’Amico, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Friday, June 7, 2019 Tags: Banks, Deutsche Bank, DOJ, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, LIBOR, Securities enforcement, U.S. federal courts Board Development and Director Succession Planning in the… [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
” The editorial board of The Washington Post argues that, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:30 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, January 4, 2019 Tags: Arbitrage, Boards of Directors, Deal protection, Engagement, Mergers & acquisitions, REITs, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits, Shareholder value Fiduciary Blind Spot: The Failure of Institutional Investors to Prevent the Illegitimate Use of Working Americans’ Savings for Corporate Political Spending Posted by Tami Groswald… [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Selikoff sat for the university entrance boards in Scotland. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 3:52 am
Schlafly v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:58 am
Likewise, the Board in Andrew R. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:55 am
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
” Briefly: The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times urges the justices to review Dassey v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:01 am
Shareholder Activists and Tardy Director Nominations Posted by Steve Wolosky, Andrew Freedman, and Ron Berenblat, Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, on Wednesday, April 25, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Delaware law, Director nominations, Disclosure, Materiality, New York, Proxy season, Securities litigation, Shareholder activism, Shareholder nominations, Shareholder voting, State law A Look Under the Hood of… [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:24 am
” The editorial board of The Los Angeles Times weighs in on last week’s per curiam decision in in Kisela v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
Constitution Daily reports that “[o]ne of the most-significant cases of the Supreme Court’s current term,” United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
The first was United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
Andrew G. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
Andrew G. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
The first was Gill v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Matthew Kahn flagged the government’s motion to limine in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am
Hogan’s campaign attorney, Dirk Haire, who also chairs the Maryland Republican Party, will ask the state prosecutor’s office to launch an official misconduct investigation if state Attorney General Brian Frosh does not act to block the fine, which was proposed by staffers at the Board of Elections in response to a complaint from Maryland Democratic Party Chairperson Kathleen Matthews. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:03 pm
Andrew Kent examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
