Search for: "Apodaca v. Does"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am
Only two states allow this, Louisiana and Oregon, and forty years ago, in Apodaca v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:53 pm
(Orin Kerr) I recently blogged about United States v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 1:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 10:54 am
A state liberty interest does not a federal liberty interest make. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:13 am
The petitioners argue that the United States Supreme Court should overrule its decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:18 am
The petitions in the cases seek to have the Court reconsider its splintered decision in 1972 in Apodaca v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 5:02 am
In Apodaca v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 6:02 am
Here’s the basic issue: In Apodaca v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 1:51 pm
Here’s the basic issue: In Apodaca v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 7:13 pm
See Apodaca v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:51 am
As the Supreme Court stated in footnote 35 of Stone v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:16 am
In Apodaca v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:42 pm
” Eugene Volokh suggests that McDonald may have yet another side effect: the Court’s decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:27 pm
In Apodaca v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:08 pm
See Apodaca v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:14 pm
The case of Apodaca v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
In 1972, the Supreme Court in Apodaca v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:00 am
The Court previously upheld the Oregon approach (which, like Louisiana but unlike the 48 other states, allows "split-verdicts") in Apodaca v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 10:10 pm
Apodaca, 112 N.M. 302, 304, 814 P.2d 1030, 1032 (Ct. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 2:46 am
The denial in Lee means it's still constitutional under Apodaca v. [read post]
