Search for: "Appeal of R. N" Results 41 - 60 of 5,869
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
The arrest here was unlawful and, therefore, must form part of the s. 24(2) analysis. [57] Accordingly, we reject the Crown and interveners’ view that we should adopt the approach set out by the Court of Appeal for Ontario in R. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In sum: once we recognize the seriousness and structural dimension of this decay, how can we continue to appeal to those same structures, to those same leaders, and above all to that same culture in crisis (to the "unwritten constitutional norms"), to solve the problems that are presently affecting our constitutional democracies - problems that are typically expressed in the lack of respect for the culture of collaboration; lack of attention to the "unwritten constitutional… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In Madison's terms, expressed in the famous Federalist Papers n. 10, the republican government was established so as to "refine and enlarge public opinions, by passing thdem through the medium of a chosen body of citizens. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 8:05 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
After Deportation or Removal Current Fee: $930 Final Fee: $1,175 I-290B Notice of Appeal or Motion Current Fee: $675 Final Fee: $800 I-485 Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (Green Card) Current Fee: $1,140 Final Fee: $1,440 I-485 Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (Green Card with Biometric Services) Current Fee: $1,225 Final Fee: $1,440 I-765 Application for Employment Authorization (EAD) filed alongside Adjustment of Status application… [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:40 pm by Dimo Michailov
N-400 naturalization, I-485 adjustment of status) will become much more expensive after April 1st and we expect a significant spike in applications before the new fees take effect. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
In Matter of F-P-R- , 24 I&N Dec. 681 (BIA 2008) , for example, the BIA declined to follow the Second Circuit’s decision in Joaquin-Porras v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 8:24 pm
[Nosotros estamos, acá, para decirles que los experimentos colectivistas nunca son la solución a los problemas, que aquejan a los ciudadanos del mundo, sino que – por el contrario – son su causa.] [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
Cela implique nécessairement cet intérêt soit personnel et direct – et non simplement moral – comme l’indique l’Honorable juge Bernard Synnott dans l’affaire Succession de Gentili (2023 QCCS 4737). [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm by Norman L. Eisen
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit,[2] and as recently as Friday by Judge Kaplan. [read post]