Search for: "Application of Marks"
Results 41 - 60
of 27,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2024, 1:59 am
Here’s what Victoria writes:3D trade mark application refused due to lack of distinctiveness: Applicant must pull up stakes (tents) at EUIPOby Victoria ThüsingOn 4 January 2024, the Fifth Board of Appeal (BoA) ruled on the appeal R 1934/2023-5 concerning EU trade mark application No. 18 821 025 (only available in the original German version). [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 4:04 am
In two ex parte applications, Greenwood J granted interlocutory injunctions restraining Customs from releasing imported goods which allegedly infringe a trade mark. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:10 am
The Applicant stressed that the padlock and pendants are also protected as 3D trade marks under EUTM application no. 018840401 for the padlock and for the pendants under EUTM registration no. 018840443. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 2:12 am
In contrast, Cook appears to have filed his trade mark applications for Cook, Cook Collection Attorneys and Cook Legal Services after he had already begun using those marks in commerce. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:22 pm
, Applicant sought registration of the mark ICAR or land vehicles in International Class 12. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 12:39 am
Accordingly, the applicant could have filed the mark applied for as a logo or a label with a frame. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:07 pm
If a Canadian trade-mark application does not contain a section 16(2) claim when filed, or contains an incomplete section 16(2) claim, the applicant may add or perfect a section 16(2) claim before the Registrar of Trade-marks approves the application for advertisement. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 2:00 am
Trade mark applications for registration need legal design . [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 9:16 pm
The Canadian Trade-Marks Office (CTMO) has published a new Practice Notice concerning transfers of trade-mark applications and registrations. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 9:15 am
aji, which argued that the application was a “repeat filing” of the earlier marks and “was aimed at circumventing the obligation to prove genuine use of those marks. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:38 pm
On July 19th, Rick Quereshi filed a Notice of Opposition against Twitter’s application for the mark TWEET. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 1:53 am
The Applicant’s mark covered camping vehicles and camping equipment and VW’s earlier marks cover broad vehicle and furniture terms. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:55 pm
The grounds of opposition included that the trade mark lacked capacity to distinguish, that it was confusingly similar to Sports Warehouse’s trade mark and also that the application was made in bad faith. [read post]
15 May 2019, 8:09 pm
The existing Trade Mark Law in China does not readily imply bad faith on trade mark applicants with no genuine intention to use. [read post]
15 May 2019, 8:09 pm
The existing Trade Mark Law in China does not readily imply bad faith on trade mark applicants with no genuine intention to use. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:36 pm
[www.supremecourtus.gov]No. 07A383 Title: Mark Dean Schwab, Applicant v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:21 am
That date marked an important change in patent law, with applications filed before being subject to the old patent law, and applications filed after being subject to the new patent law as it has been substantially rewritten by the America Invents Act. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 9:50 pm
We have learned that the Libyan Trade Mark Office has started issuing trade mark registration certificates and has also been accepting renewal applications, as of 1 October 2015.Accordingly, for any applications that have matured to registration (ie which have been published and where no oppositions have been raised) and that are still valid, a registration certificate will issue once payment of the official fees of LYD 151 (approximately US$ 111) has been made.As… [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm
This time, we have a look at a case which relied on UK passing off to oppose an EU trade mark application under Article 8(4) EUTMR. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 10:45 am
Applicant Nine Dots argued that the "OF" in its mark yields a different meaning that the "IN" in the cited mark, but the Board disagreed. [read post]
