Search for: "Arkansas Supreme Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,955
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
” Significantly, however, the Supreme Court affirmed in U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:55 am
Now that the Supreme Court has ruled that the government may cut through razor wire Texas has placed along the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
As the Court explained, id. at 829-30, the "sole purpose" of that ballot exclusion was to try to prevent the election of longtime incumbents, and the effect of the ballot exclusion was to "make it significantly more difficult for the barred candidate to win the election," id. at 831--an election that was, of course, limited to persons filling out Arkansas ballots (because the race was for a House seat from Arkansas). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
National/Federal Biden Super PAC Plans a Historic $250 Million Ad Blitz DNyuz – Reid Epstein and Shane Goldmacher (New York Times) | Published: 1/30/2024 The main Democratic super PAC supporting President Biden’s re-election bid, Future Forward, is beginning to reserve $250 million in advertising across the most important battleground states. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
We also await the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:08 am
Supreme Court ruled a similar federal law passed in 1996 unconstitutional. ( NORTHWEST INDIANA TIMES ) IL to Consider Prescription Drug Price Oversight Board A bill ( HB 4472 ) introduced in Illinois would create a board of health care experts with the authority to set limits on prescriptions drug prices. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
The Colorado Supreme Court's Decision, If Allowe [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:25 pm
Oklahoma is expected to appeal to the United States Supreme Court.[4] Whether or not the Supreme Court will choose to accept the case is uncertain. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm
Nessim MezrahiStephen SigristOne of the perennial securities class action litigation issues is the question of how courts should view plaintiff’s allegations made in reliance on short seller reports. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
The Supreme Court’s Wetland Saga Continues July 13, 2023 | Monika U. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:34 pm
The Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct determined that a 36-month suspension was appropriate for an attorney who had entered into a loan agreement with Velocity for $175,050 and later had defaulted on the loan. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:55 am
In November, we asked the Supreme Court to review Tennessee and Kentucky’s unconstitutional ban on health care for transgender youth, and expect to hear from the court early next year. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 11:06 am
Supreme Court, and a decision about whether the justices will review it is expected early next year. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
[5] The Eighth Circuit covers Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota. [6] The Supreme Court was unanimous 8-0, Justice Barrett did not partake. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:48 am
A 2019 Supreme Court decision, American Legion v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:27 pm
State, decided today by the Arkansas Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Chief Judge Brandon Harrison, joined by Judges Rita Gruber and Kenneth Hixson: Kidd and M.C. met at a private high school with ten to fifteen students. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 10:58 am
" To paraphrase the Arkansas Supreme Court, the "[voter] is entitled to form" his or her "own conclusions" on whether the proposed measure promotes integrity. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
A decision by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit late last month concerning Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), in Arkansas State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:08 am
Note that the Supreme Court is currently considering when individual officeholders' moderation of the comments on their accounts is government action (and is therefore constrained by the First Amendment) and when it's private action (and therefore not constrained by the First Amendment). [read post]
