Search for: "Armour v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
ASEAN is a political and economic organization consisting of 10 member states—Singapore, Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam and Myanmar. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 1:38 pm
Back in February of 2014, German sportswear giant Adidas filed a patent infringement suit against competitor Under Armour, Inc. in United States District Court for the District of Delaware.Adidas accused Under Armour and its newly acquired fitness tracker subsidiary, MapMyFitness, Inc., of infringing ten of its patents. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
Clark v Jeter, 486 US 456, 461 (1988). [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
Clark v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 2:09 pm
Vance v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
For instance, last summer Under Armour paid Will Ferrell and the crew at Funny or Die to produce a short video, “Tom’s Best Friend”, which featured Under Armour products worn by Patriot’s QB Tom Brady and in the background of the scene, but was more than anything a comedy sketch. [4] However, it was a comedy sketch that prominently displayed the sponsor’s brand of clothing. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
The 1773 edition of Samuel Johnson’s dictionary defined “arms” as “weapons of offence, or armour of defence. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:16 am
Gustovarac v Croatia App. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:16 am
Gustovarac v Croatia App. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 6:10 pm
Armour & Co., 402 U.S. 673, 681–82 (1971) [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:47 am
On the other hand, there are limits to this principle; here’s an excerpt from State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 9:30 am
In Law Society of Upper Canada v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:43 am
Court of Appeal, in a decision released in May 2013, also agreed with the Law Society and stated an Attorney General need not even be qualified to practice law. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 8:48 am
” Armour v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
(As it is an ongoing case, all apparent statements of fact are as set out in the judgment and should be taken as being untested at trial).Leicester Housing Association Ltd v Armstrong. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
(As it is an ongoing case, all apparent statements of fact are as set out in the judgment and should be taken as being untested at trial).Leicester Housing Association Ltd v Armstrong. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 2:51 pm
The pinnacle – or perhaps the nadir – of the Davison line was the Third’s Circuit’s decision in Armour Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:05 am
Nike v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 3:51 am
Under Armour, Inc. v. [read post]
