Search for: "Arthur v. City of Los Angeles"
Results 41 - 60
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:31 pm
The Unions allegedly repeated this use of false CEQA challenges to delay projects and pressure developers into agreeing to only use union labor throughout Los Angeles county. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:47 pm
City of Los Angeles et al. [read post]
21 May 2019, 9:08 am
S238563, on June 4, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. in its Los Angeles courtroom. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am
City of Los Angeles (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 185, there were no fluctuating EIR project descriptions, nor was there a misleadingly minimized initial project description. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
City of Irvine (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 1110 (“Royalty”) and Friends of Riverside’s Hills v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:30 am
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 473, a case with which CBIA noted its holding was “not inconsistent,” and “which was one of several cases that implicitly held CEQA does not generally require an agency to analyze how existing hazards or conditions might impact a project’s users or residents. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 4:00 pm
The Royal Way of Prague traverses the Staroměstské Náměstí (the Old Town Square), crosses the river at the venerable Karlův Most (Charles Bridge), and then climbs the hill on the river’s left bank to Pražský hrad (the Prague Castle, as depicted in the picture at the top of the post). [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Selikoff arrived in Los Angeles, California, from Sydney, Australia, on the S.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm
” (Quoting Lyon v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 1:15 pm
Citizens Coalition Los Angeles v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:16 pm
City of Los Angeles, (BNSF Railway Company, Real Party in Interest) (2018) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
Los Angeles Conservancy v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
City [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:59 pm
Taking Creed-21 up on its proposal, Walmart moved to compel Creed-21 to produce its PMQ, submitting to the court a recent hearing transcript from another Los Angeles Superior Court action in which Creed-21 was also represented by Briggs. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:26 pm
The opinion resulted from the second appeal in long-running litigation challenging approvals for the controversial Newhall Ranch development project in northwest Los Angeles County. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 11:35 am
Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 362, 386.) [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:26 pm
City of Los Angeles (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 185, 192-193 (County of Inyo).) [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68, 81 [holding “trial court has inherent power in mandamus action to remand a matter to an administrative agency for clarification of ambiguous findings”]; Keeler v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68, 81 [holding “trial court has inherent power in mandamus action to remand a matter to an administrative agency for clarification of ambiguous findings”]; Keeler v. [read post]
