Search for: "BAYER CORP." Results 41 - 60 of 505
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2017, 6:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Bayer Corp., it is an erroneous argument that an unnamed class member is a party to the class action litigation before the class is certified. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 8:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2017) (quoting Mentor Graphics Corp. v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 9:25 am by Audrey A Millemann
  The court applied the Supreme Court’s two-part test set forth in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 9:25 am by Audrey A Millemann
  The court applied the Supreme Court’s two-part test set forth in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:00 am by Karl Bayer
by Mark Kantor and Karl Bayer In National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 1:20 pm by Phyllis H. Marcus and Emma Lewis
NetSpend Settles Deceptive Advertising Claims with FTC NetSpend Corp recently agreed to settle FTC allegations that the company deceived consumers about access to funds deposited to debit cards. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 1:20 pm by Phyllis H. Marcus
NetSpend Settles Deceptive Advertising Claims with FTC NetSpend Corp recently agreed to settle FTC allegations that the company deceived consumers about access to funds deposited to debit cards. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:17 am by Charles Casper
Bayer Corp., 727 F.3d 300 (3d Cir. 2013), the Third Circuit added a second prong to the ascertainability requirement—that there must be “a reliable and administratively feasible” method for ascertaining proposed class members,  Carrera, 727 F.3d at 308, so they can be notified of their right to opt out, fraudulent claims can be policed, and defendants may exercise their due process right to challenge the proof used to demonstrate class membership. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:17 am by Charles Casper
Bayer Corp., 727 F.3d 300 (3d Cir. 2013), the Third Circuit added a second prong to the ascertainability requirement—that there must be “a reliable and administratively feasible” method for ascertaining proposed class members,  Carrera, 727 F.3d at 308, so they can be notified of their right to opt out, fraudulent claims can be policed, and defendants may exercise their due process right to challenge the proof used to demonstrate class membership. [read post]