Search for: "BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD"
Results 41 - 60
of 11,340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 10:00 am
In accordance with Section 21 of the Norwegian Constitution and Section 55 of the Court Act, the Norwegian King appoints the justices, following a review by the Innstillingsrådet (the Employment Advisory Board for the Courts). [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
This third article reviews initiatives at the state level in Colorado. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
Bob Menendez is on for the second time in a decade on federal charges he used his position and influence to benefit a trio of businesspeople who were plying him with luxury gifts. [read post]
16 May 2024, 11:56 am
The CMA’s approach to merger review in the AI industry is a small, but important, part of this picture. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:21 am
This means the company’s procedures, including the risk assessment, need to be documented and subject to periodic review. [read post]
16 May 2024, 6:51 am
With technology tools and resources that support our hybrid work environment, our colleagues enjoy a culture of learning, support for work and personal goals, opportunities to give back to our communities, and competitive benefits and rewards programs. [read post]
15 May 2024, 11:31 am
Rules Governing Director Review of Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decisions (Docket No. [read post]
15 May 2024, 8:58 am
Total recovery capacity, timelines, optimal options available and deliverable benefits likely vary considerably depending on the scenario. [read post]
14 May 2024, 9:05 pm
It is based on their recent article, “Board Observers,” forthcoming in the Illinois Law Review and available here. [read post]
14 May 2024, 9:15 am
During the free consultation, the lawyer will review your case. [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:43 pm
The USPTO recognizes the possibility that AI will be used to prepare and prosecute patent and trademark applications, as well as other filings before the Office including filings submitted to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
13 May 2024, 11:27 am
Appeal to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA): If the Veteran remains dissatisfied with the outcome of the Decision Review, they can formally appeal to the BVA. [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:49 am
Cuozzo held that the AIA grants the USPTO authority to issue regulations governing inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, including the authority to require the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to apply the broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI) standard when construing patent claims in IPRs. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
” “Delaware Supreme Court Holds MFW Inapplicable Based on Banker Conflict Disclosure Deficiencies” — “The Delaware Supreme Court has reversed a Court of Chancery decision dismissing challenges to the acquisition of Inovalon Holdings, Inc. by a consortium led by Swedish private equity firm Nordic Capital in a decision demonstrating the importance of disclosure of financial advisor conflicts in order to obtain the benefit of business judgment rule review… [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:30 am
The Delaware Supreme Court has reversed a Court of Chancery decision dismissing challenges to the acquisition of Inovalon Holdings, Inc. by a consortium led by Swedish private equity firm Nordic Capital[1] in a decision demonstrating the importance of disclosure of financial advisor conflicts in order to obtain the benefit of business judgment rule review under Kahn v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:30 am
The Delaware Supreme Court has reversed a Court of Chancery decision dismissing challenges to the acquisition of Inovalon Holdings, Inc. by a consortium led by Swedish private equity firm Nordic Capital[1] in a decision demonstrating the importance of disclosure of financial advisor conflicts in order to obtain the benefit of business judgment rule review under Kahn v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
The petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the determinations of the Board of Trustees dated April 12, 2018, and March 12, 2020. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
The petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the determinations of the Board of Trustees dated April 12, 2018, and March 12, 2020. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:20 am
Was the benefit meaningful? [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
The board may be required to show, under the enhanced scrutiny standard of review, that it acted reasonably to obtain the best transaction available to maximize shareholder value. [read post]
