Search for: "Baby Products Antitrust v."
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Ornamentality exceptions, like LTTB, versus dog toys & shoes, which are not seen as the same—wrestling with speech v. product v. conduct. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:46 am
Babies R Us Faces Antitrust Claims
The Legal Intelligencer
A federal judge has refused to dismiss antitrust suits accusing retail giant Babies R Us of conspiring with makers of high-end baby products to set minimum resale prices to squelch competition from Internet retailers. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
First Quality Baby Products, LLC, No. 15-927 (laches in patent cases) Argued – Awaiting Decision: Life Technologies Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Literature claims: strong TM protection is likely to lead to investment into strengthening the mark, not to innovation in product; and TMs are more valuable for incremental innovation than basic, so that might induce overinvestment in existing tech rather than new and untried tech. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Ross, the Court questions whether states can ban products for moral reasons. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 10:01 am
. - A discussion of the state action doctrine and, in particular, its challenge to the hospital merger-to-monopoly in FTC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
Although the original Noerr-Pennington doctrine cases specifically addressed claims of antitrust liability, later cases have held that the immunity applies with equal force in tort cases. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Endorsement by Monroe means something v. different from endorsement by ABG but courts have refused to distinguish those things. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Exxon survey: Nike v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
Like Johnson & Johnson — whose effort to avoid tort liability, in litigation alleging that talc found in some of its products (most notably, baby powder) caused ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, through a creative bankruptcy maneuver was recently rejected by the U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:42 am
It’s easier to drive through 3 inches of snow on a major artery than to push a baby carriage through 3 inches on a sidewalk, so reversing the priorities helps equity and decreases health costs. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
CD Baby purports to offer the most “organic, free-range, grass-fed” music in the world. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
Heymann: This is tied to TM as source indicator v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
: (IP tango), China: Pfizer loses trade mark action against Jaingsu Lianhuan Pharmaceutical Co over 3D mark: (Rouse & Co International), India: More patents for new forms issued to generics: (Patent Circle), India: Gauri Kamath on drug ‘differential pricing’ in India: (Spicy IP), Mexico: Revised health supplies regulations promise changes for generics: (International Law Office), US: World drug pricing crisis: Congressmen criticise US Trade Representative over Special 301… [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 12:55 am
Low-Profile Supreme Court Case Offers Glimpse of Sharp Divide
Legal Times
The case of Bowles v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (rychlicki.net), United States: Is the Justice Department really thinking about going after all of Google’s business on antitrust? [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:12 am
” Lastowka: but the competitive need is [often] derived from the brand not from the product. [read post]
