Search for: "Bakke v. Regents of University of California"
Results 41 - 60
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2021, 6:55 am
Supreme Court decision that outlaws “reverse discrimination,” Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
10/12/1977: Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:32 am
See Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 8:00 am
Since its 1978 decision in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 2:36 pm
Virginia (Equal Protection) (1041-1047) Affirmative Action (1051-1052) Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
10/12/1977: Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Virginia (1967) Module 10: Affirmative Action on the Burger and Rehnquist Courts Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Boren (1976), Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Boren (1976), Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:47 pm
Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:30 am
Regents of the University of California first articulated the diversity rationale for lower courts and institutions of higher learning. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
10/12/1977: Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 7:30 am
Boren (1976) Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Bakke and Richmond v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
While Fisher (and Grutter before it) were litigated primarily under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (which directly governs public universities), the Supreme Court for 40 years now has held that—in the words of Justice Lewis Powell in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In reaching this result, the Grutter Court relied heavily on Justice Lewis Powell’s writing 25 years earlier in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
One problem, the Court said, was that of proof of remedial fit: It is sheer speculation how many minority firms there would be in Richmond absent past societal discrimination, just as it was sheer speculation how many minority medical students would have been admitted to the medical school at Davis [in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Bakke and Richmond v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 10:07 am
But there is another landmark case that is apt to trouble the court in coming years: Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:31 pm
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy’s announced retirement came one day short of the 40th anniversary of Board of Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
