Search for: "Bar Medical Holdings II LLC" Results 41 - 60 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2016, 8:13 am
”  Id. at 11.The Chief Justice’s 2015 Report was among the authorities cited in Kissing Camels Surgery Center, LLC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 8:19 am by Adam Weinstein
The Brogdon entities involved in the SEC complaint include: Arcadia Partners, LLC, Attalla Nursing ADK, LLC, Bama Oaks Retirement, LLC, Bleckley NH LLC, Cedala, LLC, Chattahoochee Nursing, LLC, Chelsea Investments, LLC, Chestnut Independent Living, LLC, Chulio Assisted Living, LLC, Coosa Nursing ADK, LLC, Country Club Road ALF, LLC, Eaglewood Property Holdings, LLC, Edwards Redeemer… [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
What if one holds that the contract was procured by barratry and is void, and the other one reaches the opposite conclusion? [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am by John Ehrett
Vederi, LLC 14-448Issue: Whether, when an applicant for a patent amends a claim to overcome the Patent and Trademark Office’s earlier disallowance of the claim, a court should (i) presume that the amendment narrowed the claim and strictly construe the amended claim language against the applicant, as this Court has held; or (ii) presume that the claim scope remained the same and require that any narrowing be clear and unmistakable, as the Federal Circuit has held. [read post]
21 May 2015, 1:09 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 The Weeks Estimator was a Class II medical device subject to the 510(k) process, which requires the party seeking to market a device to notify the FDA prior to marketing it. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit 2011).Count II of the S1 Indictment charges Yücel with violating 18 U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am by Maureen Johnston
Reno violation was based on clearly erroneous fact-finding; and (4) whether the majority erred in holding that strict scrutiny requires a legislature to adopt the least restrictive means possible for complying with the Voting Rights Act, instead of a redistricting plan that substantially addresses such compliance. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  We’re celebrating the new year in our usual style, with our annual top ten best prescription medical product liability litigation decisions of 2014. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 8:45 am by Barry Sookman
David Price – Part II http://t.co/CMl42q7Vjo -> Video – what should you know about CASL? [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm by Don Cruse
The Court further holds that this “service” of a medical expert report does not need to follow the formalities that Rule 106 requires for serving the citation in the underlying lawsuit. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Danek Medical, Inc., 37 S.W.3d 429, 445 (Tenn. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:46 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Court agreed, holding that the "relevant date" for purposes of the 300-day time bar is the "date of notice" of the new charges. [read post]