Search for: "Bates v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2007, 9:41 am
By Eric Goldman The Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:45 pm
” He asked O’Quinn: “What checks the action of the United States regarding these detainees? [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:43 am
More recently, in Hassen v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 8:18 am
Bates and the president who his determined to destroy the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
18 May 2012, 9:43 am
United States (Inter-Am. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:13 am
The major job of the court is to keep the law of the United States more or less uniform. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:45 am
Similarly, in Nixon v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:45 am
” The Court in Boumediene “made clear that its decision was dependent on the extraordinary nature of the United States presence in Guantanamo. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:18 pm
United States, 522 U.S. 23, 29 (1997). [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 2:09 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm
: GPO, United States Commission of Civil Rights, 1970. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 12:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:10 am
The last time we covered the progress of the case that I’ll call Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 12:43 pm
Next up is the recent action in the Supreme Court of the United States, where (i) Travel Ban 3.0 just got some very good news, (ii) the third-party doctrine looks likely to be shrunk to some degree in Carpenter, and (iii) owners of Persian sarcophagi are watching the Rubin case unfold with bated breath. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:56 am
District Judge John Bates said in a written opinion that al-Awlaki's father does not have the authority to sue to stop the United States from killing his son. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:29 am
United States, 498 U.S. 935, 404 (1991) (“It is well established that, absent a clear direction by Congress to the contrary, a law takes effect on the date of its enactment. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:21 pm
Upstream is at issue in EFF’s Jewel v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 4:00 am
United States, in which the court held that a driver can object under the Fourth Amendment to a search of a rental car even when he is not listed on the rental agreement, “suggests a wholesale rewrite of the Supreme Court’s decisions governing when police are allowed to intrude on a suspect’s privacy” and “could throw federal law enforcement into chaos. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
In United States v. [read post]
