Search for: "Bates v. United States Department of Justice" Results 41 - 60 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2009, 9:42 am
Here's the language: "Absent a court order requiring the reading of such statements, no member of the Armed Forces and no official or employee of the Department of Defense or a component of the intelligence community (other than the Department of Justice) may read to a foreign national who is captured or detained outside the United States as an enemy belligerent and is in the custody or under the effective control of the Department of… [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Justice Department, however, entered the case, saying that if Judge Collyer did not dismiss the lawsuit outright, the government would invoke the so-called “state secrets privilege” in a move to block it from going forward. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 3:24 pm
The Justice Department argued in its motion to dismiss that Bagram is so much a part  of ongoing military operations that there simply is no role for U.S. courts to play. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
The biggest story in the world this week was of course the election of Donald Trump as the next President of the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
  To be sure, all United States persons, including citizens and taxpayers, have an interest in ensuring that the Executive complies with the law, and acts only when authorized to do so. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:53 pm by Margaret Taylor
United States as permitting “Congress to inquire into and publicize corruption, maladministration or inefficiency in agencies of the Government. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:16 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
The United States Supreme Court is set to make a final decision regarding the legality of the DACA program at any time. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
United States The Daily Mail had a piece “Kailyn Lowry files a defamation lawsuit against her Teen Mom 2 costar Briana Dejesus alleging she made ‘untrue’ statements”. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am by Sam Murrant
Firstly, a judgment will be issued this Thursday on kettling (Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom; a brief history of the case can be found here) by the Grand Chamber of the ECHR. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:40 am by Chris Gober
He previously served as General Counsel to the National Republican Senatorial Committee, Deputy Counsel to the Republican National Committee, and Counsel in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Policy, where he worked on national security issues and the nominations of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito to the U.S. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
United States A Florida judge has denied an attempt by the former T-Mobile chief executive John Legere to dismiss a $100m defamation suit brought again [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Austin v UK and Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) It is in this context that the cases of Austin v UK and Von Hannover (No 2) are considered, in order to argue that certain of the proposals currently being put forward are echoed in dominant themes within the judgments. [read post]