Search for: "Black v. State Personnel Board" Results 41 - 60 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, Haynes and Boone, LLP Partners Dan Gold, Kit Addleman, Thad Behrens, Emily Westridge Black, Carrie Huff, Tim Newman, David Siegal, and Odean Volker take a look at the important securities litigation developments during 2017. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
Phillips' posting on an anti-vaccination message board that he is subject to this order, and explaining McCauley's rationale for getting the order, as a way of warning others about the possible consequences of their speech. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm by Nicholas R. Parrillo
Indeed, many have argued that the aspiration of Brown v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities Alabama – Supreme Court Stops Lower Court Order Requiring Alabama to Draw a New District Voting Map Favorable to Black Residents MSN – Robert Barnes (Washington Post) | Published: 2/7/2022 The U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
NYC Board of Education 5th Cir.o 5th Circuit doesn't buy salesman's argumentTaylor v. [read post]
These costs might include hiring (or increasing) security personnel, boarding up windows and doors, securing inventory in place or moving inventory and operations off-site. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
John Nowell, Jr., the chief of naval personnel; Lt. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The Taft Court exemplifies the fact that in the Court’s long history, time, context, and personnel have been decisive. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The new map came after the same panel of federal judges twice found that lines drawn by the GOP-dominated Legislature likely violated the Voting Rights Act by weakening the power of Black voters. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]