Search for: "Branch v. United States et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2023, 7:12 pm
ALLIANCE FOR HIPPOCRATIC MEDICINE, ET AL. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
At 10 a.m. next Monday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on a case that implicates the constitutional authority of all three branches of the government: Zivotofsky, et al., v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 11:00 am
In a case of first impression nationally, the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:49 am
LEGOME, ET AL., App. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 10:28 am
IMAX Corporation et al. [2009] O.J. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 9:50 am
Clinton, et al. on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia). [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:27 pm
The Mississippi Supreme Court's decision in In re Hooker et al, which ruled on the State's challenge to the recent gubernatorial pardons, reads like a civics lesson directed to State Attorney General Jim Hood. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am
Stig Strömholm, ‘The Tension between Human Rights and Responsibilities’, Juridical Review (2004), pp. 13, 15; see also R (Al-Rawi & Ors) v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:40 am
United States District Judge James S. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
Al Qaida, et al. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
Movsesian, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:31 am
Humanitarian Law Project et. al. 08-1498 A Service from the ABA Criminal Justice Section, http://www.abanet.org/crimjust This summary has been created by Professor Rory K. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:09 am
Whitmer et al. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:15 am
Provencio, et al. [read post]
26 May 2016, 10:57 am
Winslow Jr. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
This Tuesday, the Supreme Court held in Jesner et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:30 am
Citing Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, the court further ruled that Supreme Court had also properly granted that branch of the employee organization’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint seeking to recover damages for discrimination "for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:25 am
§§ 948a et seq.] may be convened by the Secretary of Defense or by an officer or official of the United States designated by the Secretary for that purpose” (emphasis added by the court). [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 6:56 am
Federal Communications Commission et al. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am
(See here for the executive branch’s most complete statement of why it believes the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs are properly construed to apply to the armed conflict against the Islamic State.) [read post]
