Search for: "Brooks v. May et al" Results 41 - 60 of 189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2011, 7:23 am by Schachtman
  For instance, studies of a drug under scrutiny may show no increased risk for all cardiovascular events, but closer inspection may show an increased risk for heart attacks while also showing a decreased risk for strokes. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:10 am by The Docket Navigator
The United States favored a stay of litigation in San Francisco Technologies v Adobe, et al., in the Northern District of California this spring to await the Federal Circuit’s decision in Stauffer.Now the Federal Circuit has line up squarely against Simonian in this matter. [read post]
19 May 2011, 4:33 am by Dianne Saxe
PNAS 2007 May 22;104(21):8897-8901 [3] Lajeunesse A et al. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Research Methodology Much of the data and analysis presented in the article by Barrero et al., are taken from the authors’ own study, the U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm by Marie Louise
Lenovo International, et. al. / No, DED Brigham and Women’s Hospital Inc. et al v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
We reiterate, however, that each case is fact specific (see, People v West, 271 AD2d 806; People v Brooks, 270 AD2d 206, lv denied 95 NY2d 794; People v Parr, 155 AD2d 945, lv denied 75 NY2d 870 [all holding that a defendant who performs a significant act of domestic violence against a mother in the presence of a child is guilty of endangering the welfare of that child]). [95 N.Y.2d 374] With respect to defendant's appeal, the issues presented either lack… [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:06 am by John Elwood
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of Michigan, et al. [read post]