Search for: "Butler v. James" Results 41 - 60 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2021, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Concrete Proceeding or to seek an extension of time to answer constitutes a breach of the standard of professional care (Shapiro v Butler, 273 AD2d 657, 658 [3d Dept 2000]). [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 3:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"James Butler is Vice President of Legal Affairs and Intellectual Property at Sapphire Energy. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 8:37 am by Andrew Hamm
For instance, Sanford joined Taft’s opinion in Coronado Coal Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:05 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Co., 2009 WL 3793590, A.D. 09-11444 (Butler Co. [read post]
4 May 2009, 6:26 am
Jerry Trussell, No. 99,411 (Butler)Direct appeal; First-degree murderMichael C. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 11:59 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Rolland Berreth, No. 99,937 (Butler)Sentencing appeal (petition for review)Michael P. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 2:38 pm by Jason Noakes
James Pere claimed to have suffered psychiatric injury due to the negligence of QHHS and/or assault by its employees when taking the samples. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:32 pm
Justice Butler considered in Stewart v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm by David Kopel
Butler (1936), adopted the broader, Hamiltonian reading. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 1:28 am by Mike
Butler Chamberlain-Nielsen Ranch is an insurance defense case where First Financial (and a dozen others) provided representation for Butler in a construction defect case. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on James E. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:06 am by INFORRM
The two day trial in the case of Barry v Butler did not begin on 12 March 2015. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:51 am
This is a question the Court of Appeal considered in its recent judgment in James Butler v John Smith. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
  However, in Venables and Thompson v News Group Newspapers([2001] EWHC 32 (QB)) Butler-Sloss P held that such an injunction could be granted in support of an action for breach of confidence. [read post]