Search for: "C. E., ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED" Results 41 - 60 of 79
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
The plaintiffs brought claims for themselves (individual claims) and on behalf of a putative class of similarly situated consumers (class allegations). [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 4:50 pm by req@quintilone.com
In a lawsuit brought by Viet Bui and Christina Avalos-Reyes on behalf of themselves and similarly situated employees known as Viet Bui et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:13 am by Barry Sookman
The judge also ruled there was a strong case that the defendants were violating the Radiocommunication Act: I also find that the Plaintiffs have made a strong prima facie case that the devices sold by the Defendants are used to access content that may contravene paragraph 9(1)(c) of the Radiocommunication Act. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm by stevemehta
Csepanyi diagnosed cellulitis of the toes, cyanosis, and a toe abscess, all of which point to cellular deterioration and tissue destruction from peripheral vascular ischemia. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  A plaintiff whose PII, PFI, or PPI was stolen by hackers typically brings suit against the hacked company on his or her own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly situated people, hoping the presiding court will certify the proposed class and allow the case to proceed as a class action.[3]  Causes of action in customer cases run a wide gamut of legal theories, from traditional tort claims (negligence and fraud) to allegations of state and federal… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 In that situation, “heeding” the warning can only mean not using the product at all, because that’s the only way to avoid the risk. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Under Section 4(1)(c) of the Right to Information Act (RTI Act), every public authority has the duty to publish all relevant facts while announcing decisions which affect the public. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
One dealt with L-1B specialized knowledge in general, and the other focused on the significant impact on “new office” situations. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
One dealt with L-1B specialized knowledge in general, and the other focused on the significant impact on “new office” situations. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
One dealt with L-1B specialized knowledge in general, and the other focused on the significant impact on “new office” situations. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
One, on behalf of the Becket Institute, is in Overall v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
… [W]e do agree that there is a problem out there—or if not a problem—it's a perceived problem with deceptive practices by some providers out there. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:21 am by Schachtman
  These examples were effectively aimed at showing that the overall opinion advanced by Rabbi Teitelbaum and others, on behalf of plaintiffs in Joiner, were unreliable. [read post]