Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2023, 1:12 pm
Scheduling Cities in California and other states have recently enacted ordinances requiring employers, particularly those in the retail industry, to provide their employees advance notice of schedules, as well as premium wages for schedule changes. [read post]
29 May 2020, 6:55 am
In doing so, the Court confirmed that in California, specific identifiable trade secrets are required and general industry knowledge and “know how” is insufficient for trade secret protection. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 8:20 pm
Ashley Furniture Industries Inc. is the sole member of Stoneledge Furniture LLC, the Limited Liability Company that employed Plaintiff and the other class members. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 10:12 am
But then in a federal breach of contract case involving a state-legal cannabis company (Siva Enterprises v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am
CALIFORNIA INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT REJECTS PREEMPTION ARGUMENT BY TRANSPORTATION COMPANY. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:01 am
In August 2016, the Supreme Court of California issued its decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 6:47 pm
Many insurance industry analysts and counsel had expected the Court to continue to limit the duty to defend to court proceedings, as it had done in Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 2:00 am
The court ruled on April 30 in the appeal of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 2:00 am
The court ruled on April 30 in the appeal of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:28 am
On September 18 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law AB-5, which codified the California Supreme Court’s Dynamex v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 5:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:23 pm
As we have previously reported here, California Assembly Bill 5 (the bill) is slated to codify the California Supreme Court’s 2018 landmark decision in Dynamex Operations West v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:20 am
Allstate Insurance Company, Defendants (Memorandum and Order, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York) Industry Group Calls on Finra to Drop Series 7 Sponsorship Requirement (Financial IQ by Sam Del Rowe) Financial Professionals Coalition, Ltd. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:03 pm
See Morales v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:13 am
The California Supreme Court has announced its decision in People ex rel. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
While this California court opinion remains controlling authority in that state, though, it surely will inspire additional plaintiffs to give it a shot. [read post]
11 May 2023, 11:35 am
The challengers had also made a second argument: Under the Supreme Court’s 1970 decision in Pike v. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 12:28 pm
United States, filed in January in the Central District Court of California. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Ogundare v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 10:09 am
The Supreme Court has denied a request to publish a decision by the First District Court of Appeal in Southern California Labor/Management Operating Engineers Contract Compliance Committee v. [read post]
