Search for: "CASTRO v. STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2023, 11:59 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Castro-Huerta that a state may prosecute a non-Indian for a crime committed against an Indian within Indian country. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:15 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Castro-Huerta -- Rebalancing Federal-State-Tribal Power Stacy Leeds, Robert J.... [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:15 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: respondents-brief-1Download United States Amicus Brief Five Tribes Amicus Brief NCAI Amicus Brief Former US Attys Amicus Brief Peace Commission Treaty Tribes Amicus Brief NIWRC Amicus Brief Scholars Amicus Brief Topside briefs here. [read post]
28 Jan 2003, 9:22 am
[JURIST] Although no cert grants were announced in Monday's regular Order List [PDF text], the US Supreme Court did grant cert Monday in Castro v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:09 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The grant is limited to question 1 — here are the questions presented: Whether a State has authority to prosecute non- Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.Whether McGirt v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 12:54 pm by Immigration Prof
Steve Vladeck on Just Security writes about a spectacular new court of appeals decision: In a breathtaking 80-page opinion handed down today in Castro v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:30 am by azatty
Raúl Castro Arizona’s state government is ever changing and chronicled in the evolution of the Arizona State Capitol Complex. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 2:22 pm by Ezra Rosser
Castro-Huerta that “Indian country is part of the State, not separate from the State” is a reminder of tribal sovereignty’s precarious foundation under U.S. law. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The evolution of New York’s whistle blower laws protecting public officers and employees Castro v City of New York, 2016 NY Slip Op 05615, Appellate Division, First DepartmentIn his notice of claim dated November 17, 2012, Robert J. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 4:14 pm
And totally agree both that the State's mistake here was inexcuable (which it forthrightly admits) and that it's not that great of a burden to say to a State, in esssence: "When the judiciary orders you to retry or release a prisoner within 60 days, and you don't, you can't just ignore the Order and continue to hold him; you've got to release him. [read post]