Search for: "CHANG et al v. SULLIVAN et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the… [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 10:16 am
Successfully sued suggests that these cases were tried to a verdict, which in the case of Grillo v Pettiete et al Cause 96-145090-92 and Grillo v Henry Cause 96-167943-96 96th Dist, Ct Tarrant County, TX, simply wasn't true. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm
The Clearing House was represented by Sullivan & Cromwell and Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, and locally by a Tyler firm, Flowers Davis. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of the Second Circuit's holding on federal (non)preemption of state usury laws in Saliha Madden v Midland Funding LLC et al, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:18 am
Today the Supreme Court made an effort to clarify that line in AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ET AL. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
James III, et al. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 9:29 am
Circuit Court of Appeals decision in UnitedHealthcare Insurance Co. et al. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm
HAINES, JAMES BRONNER, SIMONE BRONNER, NATHANIEL BRONNER, GEORGE RUSSELL CURTIS, SR., et al., Defendants-Appellees. 11th Circuit.Bankruptcy - Transfer made by debtor involved in Ponzi scheme in order to redeem equity investment may constitute transfer "for value. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
There are many factors that have contributed to increased expectations for corporations to adopt CSR programs as governments have changed the scope and thrust of their regulatory and ownership roles, and as regulatory governance principles that favor of market-based approaches have become more compelling for many states. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm
On reflection: Dietemann v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 4:26 pm
Yet in laboratories all over the world, research has consistently shown that most commonsense behavioral cues are not diagnostic of truth and deception (DePaulo et al., 2003). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
District Court in TikTok Inc. et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
: (Spicy IP), It’s a mad idea, but it might just work – Sun’s decision to reduce number of patent applications: (IAM) More alternative ADR practices: preventing patent shark attacks: (The IP ADR Blog), The ADR: insurance and indemnity agreements – protecting against patent terrorists: (The IP ADR Blog), Language and IP value and valuation: (Pat Sullivan’s Blog) Global - Copyright Grammy winner, Joss Stone, shows support for music… [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(IP Think Tank) A defining time for the IP market (IAM) Busting an intellectual capital myth (Pat Sullivan’s Blog) Governments, financial stakeholders meet on policy for IP as collateral (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP finance) How much should you spend on start-up marketing? [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
Sullivan who would gladly have bankrupted the New York Times in a trumped-up defamation suit. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
News & Analysis 11111-11114 (2010).Batker, David, et al. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
EPA estimates the purchases and changes will cost about $3 million. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
