Search for: "CO-1 SPENCER" Results 41 - 60 of 440
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2015, 3:06 pm
 This is Tim's take on this topic:Supreme Petfoods v Henry Bell & Co: why the Court of Appeal was wrong in Interflora on the burden of proof in "double identity" casesSupreme Petfoods is remarkable for Arnold J’s tour de force analysis of the CJEU’s case-law on the double identity rule (Article 5(1)(a) of Directive 2008/95 and Article 9(1)(a) of Community Trade Mark Regulation 207/2009), and for his conclusion, disagreeing with the Court… [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Trump Is Charged Under Civil Rights Law Used to Prosecute KKK Violence MSN – Isaac Stanley-Becker and Spencer Hsu (Washington Post) | Published: 8/1/2023 When Donald Trump was indicted and accused of trying to subvert the results of the 2020 presidential election, he found himself in the unenviable company of defendants charged under a criminal statute dating to the Reconstruction era. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 2:19 pm by Dan Ernst
Diane Barnes, Spencer Crew, Lucy Salyer, and Michael Vorenberg. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 12:41 pm by NARF
Department of the Interior (Fee to Trust; Administrative Procedure Act) Spencer v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:02 pm by Joe Whitworth
Results by retailer Marks and Spencer had 1 percent in the maximum category in October, November and December from 376 chickens sampled. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Donald Trump filed the claim against Orbis Business Intelligence, a British firm co-founded by Christopher Steele, a former MI6 intelligence officer. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 3:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Barocca v Garten, 2012 NY Slip Op 30609(U) March 1, 2012 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 5249/11 Judge: Antonio I. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:42 am by sally
Supreme Court Gow v Grant (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 29 (24 May 2012) Phillips v Mulcaire (Rev 1) [2012] UKSC 28 (24 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) G1 v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 867 (04 July 2012) Daejan Properties Ltd v Campbell [2012] EWCA Civ 875 (19 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Ampurius NU Homes Holdings Ltd v Telford Homes (Creekside) Ltd [2012] EWHC 1820 (Ch) (04 July 2012) Starbucks (UK) Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Group… [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ladd has come up with an astonishing theory: the border patrol agents have been co-opted. [read post]