Search for: "California v. Campbell" Results 41 - 60 of 455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2009, 1:59 pm
Campbell, such that the ratio of ratio of punitive to compensatory damages should not exceed 1-to-1). [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 5:53 pm
Campbell (2003) 538 U.S. 408 in the California context in yesterday's decision in Holdgrafer v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Campbell, invalidity theoriesof defendant Campbell were rejected, but enhanced damageanalysis by CD Cal was rejected.Campbell Company (“Campbell”) appeals from the finaljudgment of the United States District Court for theCentral District of California entering judgment in favorof Polara Engineering Inc. [read post]
The California Supreme Court expressly rejected the Ninth Circuit’s “narrow restraint” exception to section 16600 espoused in Campbell v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:38 pm by The Federalist Society
To discuss the case, we have Ward Campbell, who is the Supervising Deputy Attorney General at the California Department of Justice. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:28 am
 The Court noted that confusion over the Ninth Circuit’s application of section 16600 arose in a paragraph in the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Campbell v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm by Mike
Several Northern California Judges have recently denied prisoner petitions for habeas corpus, among them: Hill v. [read post]