Search for: "Catherine M. Sharkey"
Results 41 - 50
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2008, 11:18 am
Preemption by preamble is a phrase that Catherine M. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 1:55 pm
A draft report from ACUS Senior Fellow Catherine Sharkey (NYU Law) and draft recommendations are now available. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
Catherine M. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Sustainable Transportation for Rural Communities March 29, 2023 | Jesus M. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Rev. 367 (2010) Thomas M. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Rev. 367 (2010) Thomas M. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
Many current tort textbooks fail to mention the defense at all.[5] Tort theorists stress the importance of the boundaries between consumers and industrial enterprises, but ignore the frequent setting in which the purchaser is itself an industrial enterprise, and has independent legal and regulatory duties to provide safe workplaces with the products at issue.[6] Highly sensitive to the need to protect ordinary consumers from the predations of large manufacturing companies, many tort theorists are… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
Stevens Brokerage - Residential Sam Wolf Investor / Owner Aharon Friedman Investor / Owner James Sharkey Investor / Owner Roseann Vidal Acquisitions Arthur Vidal Construction Saima Chowdhury Investor / Owner Benson Martin Legal Rene Perrin Investor / Owner R. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
This fall we had a conference at Case Western to explore these issues further, and we were fortunate enough to be joined by Catherine Sharkey, Suzette Malveaux, Karen Harned, Brianne Gorod and my colleague Cassandra Robertson. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
Recently, the Second Circuit issued a significant Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) decision construing the FOIA exemption covering law enforcement records that “would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law,” 5 U.S.C. [read post]
