Search for: "Children's Health Defense v. Federal Communications Commission"
Results 41 - 60
of 103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Defense attorneys attributed Cesar Sayoc’s mail-bomb activity in part to fervor for Trump’s rhetoric. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Under that program, DHS would refrain from taking immigration actions against people brought to the country as children, and those people would be eligible for work permits. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 3:50 pm
§ 3553(f)(1)–(5); US v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
” Walling v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council is suddenly under siege. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
That gathering was both formal and the mandatory performance of the rituals of passages of power within the traditions of the Mexican Republic manifested through its political community as incarnated in its institutions and as recognized by foreign powers. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:15 pm
Our partners, Kids in Need of Defense (KIND), Women’s Refugee Commission (WRC),and Justice in Motion will serve as members of the Steering Committee, and will, among other tasks, facilitate communication regarding the wishes of parents and children who are still separated, and provide in-country support for locating deported parents. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
The court said that the underlying facts, coupled the absence of charges ever having previously been filed against the teacher during his 21-year career, supported the Commissioner’s determination that the penalty imposed was proportionate to the offenses for which the teacher was found guilty.The authority of an arbitrator to modify the disciplinary penalty proposed by the employer was a significant issue in Communication Workers of Am., Local 1170 v Town of Greece, 85 AD3s… [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
US v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
” T-Mobile and Sprint asked the Federal Communications Commission for permission to merge into a new company. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm
One of the most frequently violated and litigated federal employment laws, the FLSA generally requires that U.S. employers pay nonexempt employees at least $7.25 per hour for all regular compensable hours worked, plus time and one-half their regular rates, including commissions, bonuses and incentive pay, for hours worked beyond 40 per week. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The court said that the underlying facts, coupled the absence of charges ever having previously been filed against the teacher during his 21-year career, supported the Commissioner’s determination that the penalty imposed was proportionate to the offenses for which the teacher was found guilty.The authority of an arbitrator to modify the disciplinary penalty proposed by the employer was a significant issue in Communication Workers of Am., Local 1170 v Town of Greece, 85 AD3s… [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 9:43 am
V. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:24 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act – Placement)Gila River Indian Community v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:47 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Placement)Gila River Indian Community v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm
As with current “fake news” events, the “War of the Worlds” occasion was taken to chide broadcasters about the responsibility of the media to the truth and to the public.[5] The question of broadcasters’ obligations to the truth and to the public, then as now, rested legally within the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”). [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:07 pm
[United States v. [read post]
Manage Retaliation Risks In Response To Updated EEOC Enforcement Guidance, Rising Retaliation Claims
31 Aug 2016, 2:02 am
Retaliation Risks Under EEO Laws Federal EEO laws generally prohibit employers, employment agencies, or unions from punishing or taking other adverse actions against job applicants or employees for “asserting their rights” (often referred to as “protected activity”) to be free from harassment or other prohibited employment discrimination as well as certain other conduct. [read post]
