Search for: "Childs v. State of California (1983)"
Results 41 - 60
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
” In 1983 the ABA approved these new Model Rules and again urged state courts to adopt them. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962). [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:38 am
A jury found him guilty of attempted kidnapping and child molestation, and the court sentenced him to state prison for the term he was serving at the time of the filing of the present petition. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Davis, No. 06-666 In the context of states/subdivisions' exemption of interest on their own bonds from their state income taxes, which are imposed on bond interest from other states, the Court rules that Kentucky's version of such a differential tax scheme does not offend the Commerce Clause. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:17 pm
" Supreme Court of California, July 28, 2008 People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:58 pm
California Appellate Districts, October 20, 2008 Widders v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
V. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:28 am
" California Appellate Districts, January 17, 2008 "Amtower v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:05 pm
Now, the state reviews only cases before 1983. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 8:00 pm
California Appellate Districts, September 25, 2008 Hernandez v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Schales, No. 07-10288 A child pornography case is remanded to the district court with order to vacate either the conviction for receiving child pornography in violations of 18 U.S.C. section 2252(a)(2), or the conviction for possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2252(a)(4)(B), due to violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause where: 1) possession of child pornography is a lesser included offense within receipt of child pornography;… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 am
§ 1983. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:04 pm
The types that are must be authorized by a California statute. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
§ 1983. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
§ 1983. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:03 am
New York, unlike other states (such as California), does not grant divorces based on irreconcilable differences. [read post]
