Search for: "Church v. York"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
"In Collins v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:15 am
I thought we might talk a little bit about what is probably the leading case on dress codes, Jespersen v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 5:56 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 10:29 am
Antonyuk v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
John the Evangelist Crosby-on-Eden [2023] ECC Car 3 The petition proposed a ramped access at the entrance to the church, a kitchenette at the west end of the church and the erection of a single storey extension to house a WC [1]. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:38 am
See generally Lisa Zornberg, Beyond the Constitution: Is the New York Get Legislation Good Law? [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 10:46 am
In 2020, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed the state’s stringent statute of limitations on civil sexual assault cases in the matter of R.R. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 3:59 am
Even in his freshman year, Democratic New York Rep. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:23 pm
" More recently, in Grutter v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
New York: NYU Press, 2021. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
United States OT 2016 – Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Nearly a decade later, in Hill v Church of Scientology, the Court clarified that this residual relevance obliges courts to engage in principled balancing, weighing Charter values against “the principles which underlie the common law,” and using those values as “guidelines for any modification to the common law which the court feels is necessary” (Hill, para 97). [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 2:24 pm
That's not clear; compare Cavanaugh v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:07 am
Heaven Accused of Church B/E. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
" Citing Matter of Marsteller v City of New York, 217 AD3d 543, the Appellate Division noted that Plaintiff:[1] "had no demonstrated history of refusing medications or vaccines;[2] "he admitted to receiving a certain vaccination required for him to attend college; and [3] "he refused to answer a question about whether he had avoided any other vaccines or medications based on the same objection he raised to the COVID-19 vaccines. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
" Citing Matter of Marsteller v City of New York, 217 AD3d 543, the Appellate Division noted that Plaintiff:[1] "had no demonstrated history of refusing medications or vaccines;[2] "he admitted to receiving a certain vaccination required for him to attend college; and [3] "he refused to answer a question about whether he had avoided any other vaccines or medications based on the same objection he raised to the COVID-19 vaccines. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:01 am
United States OT 2016 – Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Rather, they typically mean to imply that there is no moral basis for distinguishing plant foods from animal foods, so one may as well eat animal foods.Sherry frames her consideration of this objection by respectfully considering a 2009 article in the New York Times with the not very respectful title Sorry, Vegans: Brussels Sprouts Like to Live, Too. [read post]
