Search for: "Clarence Brown" Results 41 - 60 of 575
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm by Amy Howe
But Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was unpersuaded on this point. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:04 am by Howard Bashman
Justices Clarence Thomas and Ketanji Brown Jackson issued opinions concurring in the judgment. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm by Barbara Moreno
Brown, The Dead Hand’s Grip:  How Long Constitutions Bind States (2023). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 1:42 pm by Amy Howe
” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson also pressed Garre on the limits of his position. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Ronald Mann
” Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson pretty clearly came out on the same side as Kagan. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 2:57 am by SHG
” It’s unclear why the Court’s recognition of public criticism is a good thing, given that at the time the Court decided Brown v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:20 pm by Ronald Mann
As Justice Clarence Thomas put it, “the statute defines a person as [including] any government or governmental subdivision or agency,” which seemed to him at least to “suggest that it applies to the U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 1:05 pm
Supreme Court's dawning term is quickly shedding light on fissures in a six-justice supermajority, providing new evidence of areas where the conservative camp isn't predictably rock-solid despite its rapid reshaping of the nation's legal landscape.When people describe a 3-3-3 court, they're usually picturing Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson on the left, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
These are all changed facts justifying a departure from original meaning as applied to abortion.Similarly, as the Brown v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
NBCUniversal was denied as anticipated, which drew a separate opinion from Justice Clarence Thomas noting that he would be inclined to reconsider New York Times v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm by Mark Walsh
Meanwhile, this is the third week of the new season of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s favorite TV show, “Survivor. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court, minus a recused Clarence Thomas, turned down a bid by attorney John Eastman to erase court rulings that described him as a linchpin in former President Trump’s bid to subvert the 2020 election. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 1:35 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson echoed Thomas’s sentiment. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 2:33 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Clarence Thomas voiced this worry first, asking Prelogar whether the appropriations clause imposes any limits on Congress, other than the requirement that it pass a law to allocate funds. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am by Colby Galliher
Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan concurred with the majority as concerned the Sacketts’ property but, pertaining to the question of the CWA’s scope, wrote in favor of Kennedy’s approach in the Rapanos case. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron and Laura Dooley
 During a term in which close cases were decided by how Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh would vote (compare the voting rights case with the affirmative action case), two of Court’s most conservative justices, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas, joined its two most liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, in upholding the Pennsylvania law against the claim that it violated the defendant corporation’s due process rights. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
An issue that came up during a terrific panel that I participated in last Thursday—organized by the Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project—was whether age-verification laws for social-media use infringed on a First Amendment right of either adults or minors to receive speech anonymously. [read post]